Re: [Patch bpf-next v6 02/12] skmsg: introduce a spinlock to protect ingress_msg

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 6:25 PM Yunsheng Lin [off-list ref] wrote:

On 2021/3/23 8:37, Cong Wang wrote:

quoted

+static inline struct sk_msg *sk_psock_next_msg(struct sk_psock *psock,
+                                            struct sk_msg *msg)
+{
+     struct sk_msg *ret;

Nit:
Use msg instead of ret to be consistently with sk_psock_dequeue_msg()
and sk_psock_next_msg().

Please read it carefully, clearly 'msg' is already a parameter name here.

Thanks.