Re: [Patch bpf-next v4 02/11] skmsg: introduce a spinlock to protect ingress_msg
From: Cong Wang <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-12 00:46:28
Also in:
bpf
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 3:28 AM Jakub Sitnicki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+ +static inline struct sk_msg *sk_psock_deque_msg(struct sk_psock *psock)Should be sk_psock_deque*ue*_msg()?
Right, it is better and less confusing to use "dequeue". Thanks.