Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: check flags in 'bpf_ringbuf_discard()' and 'bpf_ringbuf_submit()'
From: Song Liu <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-29 16:17:01
Also in:
bpf, linux-kselftest, lkml
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Mar 28, 2021, at 9:10 AM, Pedro Tammela [off-list ref] wrote: The current code only checks flags in 'bpf_ringbuf_output()'. Signed-off-by: Pedro Tammela <redacted> --- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 8 ++++---- kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c | 13 +++++++++++-- tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 8 ++++---- 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index 100cb2e4c104..232b5e5dd045 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h@@ -4073,7 +4073,7 @@ union bpf_attr { * Valid pointer with *size* bytes of memory available; NULL, * otherwise. * - * void bpf_ringbuf_submit(void *data, u64 flags) + * int bpf_ringbuf_submit(void *data, u64 flags)
This should be "long" instead of "int".
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
* Description * Submit reserved ring buffer sample, pointed to by *data*. * If **BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP** is specified in *flags*, no notification@@ -4083,9 +4083,9 @@ union bpf_attr { * If **BPF_RB_FORCE_WAKEUP** is specified in *flags*, notification * of new data availability is sent unconditionally. * Return - * Nothing. Always succeeds. + * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. * - * void bpf_ringbuf_discard(void *data, u64 flags) + * int bpf_ringbuf_discard(void *data, u64 flags)
Ditto. And same for tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
* Description * Discard reserved ring buffer sample, pointed to by *data*. * If **BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP** is specified in *flags*, no notification@@ -4095,7 +4095,7 @@ union bpf_attr { * If **BPF_RB_FORCE_WAKEUP** is specified in *flags*, notification * of new data availability is sent unconditionally. * Return - * Nothing. Always succeeds. + * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. * * u64 bpf_ringbuf_query(void *ringbuf, u64 flags) * Descriptiondiff --git a/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c b/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c index f25b719ac786..f76dafe2427e 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c@@ -397,26 +397,35 @@ static void bpf_ringbuf_commit(void *sample, u64 flags, bool discard)BPF_CALL_2(bpf_ringbuf_submit, void *, sample, u64, flags) { + if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP | BPF_RB_FORCE_WAKEUP))) + return -EINVAL;
We can move this check to bpf_ringbuf_commit(). Thanks, Song [...]