RE: [PATCH net-next] net: ipa: avoid 64-bit modulus
From: David Laight <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-24 16:27:53
Also in:
lkml
From: Alex Elder
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Sent: 23 March 2021 01:05 It is possible for a 32 bit x86 build to use a 64 bit DMA address. There are two remaining spots where the IPA driver does a modulo operation to check alignment of a DMA address, and under certain conditions this can lead to a build error on i386 (at least). The alignment checks we're doing are for power-of-2 values, and this means the lower 32 bits of the DMA address can be used. This ensures both operands to the modulo operator are 32 bits wide. Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <redacted> --- drivers/net/ipa/gsi.c | 11 +++++++---- drivers/net/ipa/ipa_table.c | 9 ++++++--- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/ipa/gsi.c b/drivers/net/ipa/gsi.c index 7f3e338ca7a72..b6355827bf900 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ipa/gsi.c +++ b/drivers/net/ipa/gsi.c@@ -1436,15 +1436,18 @@ static void gsi_evt_ring_rx_update(struct gsi_evt_ring *evt_ring, u32 index) /* Initialize a ring, including allocating DMA memory for its entries */ static int gsi_ring_alloc(struct gsi *gsi, struct gsi_ring *ring, u32 count) { - size_t size = count * GSI_RING_ELEMENT_SIZE; + u32 size = count * GSI_RING_ELEMENT_SIZE; struct device *dev = gsi->dev; dma_addr_t addr; - /* Hardware requires a 2^n ring size, with alignment equal to size */ + /* Hardware requires a 2^n ring size, with alignment equal to size. + * The size is a power of 2, so we can check alignment using just + * the bottom 32 bits for a DMA address of any size. + */ ring->virt = dma_alloc_coherent(dev, size, &addr, GFP_KERNEL);
Doesn't dma_alloc_coherent() guarantee that alignment? I doubt anywhere else checks? David - Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)