Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] gro: add combined call_gro_receive() + INDIRECT_CALL_INET() helper
From: Alexander Lobakin <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-19 12:50:50
Also in:
lkml
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:35:41 +0100
On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 11:43 +0000, Alexander Lobakin wrote:quoted
I'm not sure if you did it on purpose in commit aaa5d90b395a7 ("net: use indirect call wrappers at GRO network layer"). Was that intentionalI must admit that 2y+ later my own intentions are not so clear to me too;)
Heh, know that feel (=
quoted
for the sake of more optimized path for the kernels with moduled IPv6,Uhm... no I guess that was more an underlook on my side.quoted
or I can replace INDIRECT_CALL_INET() with INDIRECT_CALL_2() here too?If that build with IPV6=nmy, I would say yes.
I think you used INDIRECT_CALL_INET() to protect from CONFIG_INET=n. But this also hurts with retpoline when CONFIG_IPV6=m. Not so common case, but still. Plain INDIRECT_CALL_2() won't build without CONFIG_INET, so we either introduce a new one (e.g. _INET_2() similarly to _INET_1()), or leave it as it is for now (Dave's already picked this series to net-next).
quoted
I want to keep GRO callbacks that make use of indirect call wrappers unified.L4 will still need some special handling as ipv6 udp gro callbacks are not builtin with CONFIG_IPV6=m :(
Yep, I remember. I meant {inet,ipv6}_gro_{complete,receive}()
callers, but didn't mention that for some reason.
Cheers, Paolo
Thanks, Al