Thread (28 messages) flat view 28 messages, 7 authors, 2021-03-22

Re: [PATCH 0/7 v4] Introduce a bulk order-0 page allocator with two in-tree users

From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-17 16:40:06
Also in: linux-mm, linux-nfs, lkml

On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:31:07 +0000
Alexander Lobakin [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Mel Gorman <redacted>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:43:24 +0000

Hi there,
quoted
This series is based on top of Matthew Wilcox's series "Rationalise
__alloc_pages wrapper" and does not apply to 5.12-rc2. If you want to
test and are not using Andrew's tree as a baseline, I suggest using the
following git tree

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mel/linux.git mm-bulk-rebase-v4r2  
I gave this series a go on my setup, it showed a bump of 10 Mbps on
UDP forwarding, but dropped TCP forwarding by almost 50 Mbps.

(4 core 1.2GHz MIPS32 R2, page size of 16 Kb, Page Pool order-0
allocations with MTU of 1508 bytes, linear frames via build_skb(),
GRO + TSO/USO)
What NIC driver is this?
I didn't have time to drill into the code, so for now can't provide
any additional details. You can request anything you need though and
I'll try to find a window to collect it.
quoted
Note to Chuck and Jesper -- as this is a cross-subsystem series, you may
want to send the sunrpc and page_pool pre-requisites (patches 4 and 6)
directly to the subsystem maintainers. While sunrpc is low-risk, I'm
vaguely aware that there are other prototype series on netdev that affect
page_pool. The conflict should be obvious in linux-next.
-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help