On 2021/3/17 5:45, David Miller wrote:
From: Yunsheng Lin <redacted>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:40:56 +0800
quoted
On 2021/3/16 7:41, David Miller wrote:
quoted
From: Yunsheng Lin <redacted>
At least for the fast path, taking two locks for lockless qdisc hurts
performance when handling requeued skb, especially if the lockless
qdisc supports TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS.
The bad txq and gro skb cases are not "fast path", sorry
You are right, it is more of exceptional data path, but it is still
ok to clean that up without obvious risk, right?
For I am going to replace qdisc->seqlock with qdisc_lock(q) for lockless
qdisc too and remove qdisc->seqlock, which makes more sense.
.