Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5e: allocate 'indirection_rqt' buffer dynamically
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-03-11 22:49:48
Also in:
linux-rdma, lkml
On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 18:28 +0200, Tariq Toukan wrote:
On 3/8/2021 5:32 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:quoted
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Increasing the size of the indirection_rqt array from 128 to 256 bytes pushed the stack usage of the mlx5e_hairpin_fill_rqt_rqns() function over the warning limit when building with clang and CONFIG_KASAN: drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c:970:1: error: stack frame size of 1180 bytes in function 'mlx5e_tc_add_nic_flow' [- Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=] Using dynamic allocation here is safe because the caller does the same, and it reduces the stack usage of the function to just a few bytes. Fixes: 1dd55ba2fb70 ("net/mlx5e: Increase indirection RQ table size to 256") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.cb/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c index 0da69b98f38f..66f98618dc13 100644--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c@@ -445,12 +445,16 @@ static voidmlx5e_hairpin_destroy_transport(struct mlx5e_hairpin *hp) mlx5_core_dealloc_transport_domain(hp->func_mdev, hp->tdn); } -static void mlx5e_hairpin_fill_rqt_rqns(struct mlx5e_hairpin *hp, void *rqtc) +static int mlx5e_hairpin_fill_rqt_rqns(struct mlx5e_hairpin *hp, void *rqtc) { - u32 indirection_rqt[MLX5E_INDIR_RQT_SIZE], rqn; + u32 *indirection_rqt, rqn; struct mlx5e_priv *priv = hp->func_priv; int i, ix, sz = MLX5E_INDIR_RQT_SIZE; + indirection_rqt = kzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!indirection_rqt) + return -ENOMEM; + mlx5e_build_default_indir_rqt(indirection_rqt, sz, hp->num_channels);@@ -462,6 +466,9 @@ static void mlx5e_hairpin_fill_rqt_rqns(structmlx5e_hairpin *hp, void *rqtc) rqn = hp->pair->rqn[ix]; MLX5_SET(rqtc, rqtc, rq_num[i], rqn); } + + kfree(indirection_rqt); + return 0; } static int mlx5e_hairpin_create_indirect_rqt(struct mlx5e_hairpin *hp)@@ -482,12 +489,15 @@ static intmlx5e_hairpin_create_indirect_rqt(struct mlx5e_hairpin *hp) MLX5_SET(rqtc, rqtc, rqt_actual_size, sz); MLX5_SET(rqtc, rqtc, rqt_max_size, sz); - mlx5e_hairpin_fill_rqt_rqns(hp, rqtc); + err = mlx5e_hairpin_fill_rqt_rqns(hp, rqtc); + if (err) + goto out; err = mlx5_core_create_rqt(mdev, in, inlen, &hp-quoted
indir_rqt.rqtn);if (!err) hp->indir_rqt.enabled = true; +out: kvfree(in); return err; }Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com> Thanks for your patch. Tariq
Applied to net-next-mlx5 Thanks!