On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 17:08:13 +0900 Dominique Martinet wrote:
Jisheng Zhang wrote on Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 03:39:40PM +0800:
quoted
quoted
Rather than make an exception for 0, how about just removing the if as
follow ?
IMHO, we may need to keep the "if" in current logic. When count
reaches zero, we need to break the "while(iov_iter_count(to))" loop, so removing
the "if" modifying the logic.
We're not looking at the same loop, the break will happen properly
I was reading the old code because I switched to linux-5.4 longterm tree
for other development ;)
without the if because it's the return value of p9_client_read_once()
now.
In the old code I remember what you're saying and it makes sense, I
guess that was the reason for the special case.
It's not longer required, let's remove it.
Thank you. patch v2 is sent out.