[PATCH net 6/9] mptcp: factor out __mptcp_retrans helper()
From: Mat Martineau <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-04 21:35:01
Also in:
mptcp
Subsystem:
networking [general], networking [mptcp], the rest · Maintainers:
"David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Matthieu Baerts, Mat Martineau, Linus Torvalds
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Will simplify the following patch, no functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <redacted> --- net/mptcp/protocol.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 3dcb564b03ad..67aaf7154dca 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c@@ -2261,59 +2261,23 @@ static void mptcp_check_fastclose(struct mptcp_sock *msk) mptcp_close_wake_up(sk); } -static void mptcp_worker(struct work_struct *work) +static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk) { - struct mptcp_sock *msk = container_of(work, struct mptcp_sock, work); - struct sock *ssk, *sk = &msk->sk.icsk_inet.sk; + struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk); struct mptcp_sendmsg_info info = {}; struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag; size_t copied = 0; - int state, ret; - - lock_sock(sk); - state = sk->sk_state; - if (unlikely(state == TCP_CLOSE)) - goto unlock; - - mptcp_check_data_fin_ack(sk); - __mptcp_flush_join_list(msk); - - mptcp_check_fastclose(msk); - - if (msk->pm.status) - mptcp_pm_nl_work(msk); - - if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_EOF, &msk->flags)) - mptcp_check_for_eof(msk); - - __mptcp_check_send_data_fin(sk); - mptcp_check_data_fin(sk); - - /* There is no point in keeping around an orphaned sk timedout or - * closed, but we need the msk around to reply to incoming DATA_FIN, - * even if it is orphaned and in FIN_WAIT2 state - */ - if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD) && - (mptcp_check_close_timeout(sk) || sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE)) { - inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE); - __mptcp_destroy_sock(sk); - goto unlock; - } - - if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW, &msk->flags)) - __mptcp_close_subflow(msk); - - if (!test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_RTX, &msk->flags)) - goto unlock; + struct sock *ssk; + int ret; __mptcp_clean_una(sk); dfrag = mptcp_rtx_head(sk); if (!dfrag) - goto unlock; + return; ssk = mptcp_subflow_get_retrans(msk); if (!ssk) - goto reset_unlock; + goto reset_timer; lock_sock(ssk);
@@ -2339,9 +2303,52 @@ static void mptcp_worker(struct work_struct *work) mptcp_set_timeout(sk, ssk); release_sock(ssk); -reset_unlock: +reset_timer: if (!mptcp_timer_pending(sk)) mptcp_reset_timer(sk); +} + +static void mptcp_worker(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct mptcp_sock *msk = container_of(work, struct mptcp_sock, work); + struct sock *sk = &msk->sk.icsk_inet.sk; + int state; + + lock_sock(sk); + state = sk->sk_state; + if (unlikely(state == TCP_CLOSE)) + goto unlock; + + mptcp_check_data_fin_ack(sk); + __mptcp_flush_join_list(msk); + + mptcp_check_fastclose(msk); + + if (msk->pm.status) + mptcp_pm_nl_work(msk); + + if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_EOF, &msk->flags)) + mptcp_check_for_eof(msk); + + __mptcp_check_send_data_fin(sk); + mptcp_check_data_fin(sk); + + /* There is no point in keeping around an orphaned sk timedout or + * closed, but we need the msk around to reply to incoming DATA_FIN, + * even if it is orphaned and in FIN_WAIT2 state + */ + if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD) && + (mptcp_check_close_timeout(sk) || sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE)) { + inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE); + __mptcp_destroy_sock(sk); + goto unlock; + } + + if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW, &msk->flags)) + __mptcp_close_subflow(msk); + + if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_RTX, &msk->flags)) + __mptcp_retrans(sk); unlock: release_sock(sk);
--
2.30.1