Thread (20 messages) flat view 20 messages, 5 authors, 2021-03-05

Re: [PATCH net] net: tcp: don't allocate fast clones for fastopen SYN

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: 2021-03-04 19:43:16

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:06 PM Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 13:51:15 +0100 Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
I think we are over thinking this really (especially if the fix needs
a change in core networking or drivers)

We can reuse TSQ logic to have a chance to recover when the clone is
eventually freed.
This will be more generic, not only for the SYN+data of FastOpen.

Can you please test the following patch ?
#7 - Eric comes up with something much better :)


But so far doesn't seem to quite do it, I'm looking but maybe you'll
know right away (FWIW testing a v5.6 backport but I don't think TSQ
changed?):

On __tcp_retransmit_skb kretprobe:

==> Hit TFO case ret:-16 ca_state:0 skb:ffff888fdb4bac00!

First hit:
        __tcp_retransmit_skb+1
        tcp_rcv_state_process+2488
        tcp_v6_do_rcv+405
        tcp_v6_rcv+2984
        ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+180
        ip6_input_finish+17

Successful hit:
        __tcp_retransmit_skb+1
        tcp_retransmit_skb+18
        tcp_retransmit_timer+716
        tcp_write_timer_handler+136
        tcp_write_timer+141
        call_timer_fn+43

 skb:ffff888fdb4bac00 --- delay:51642us bytes_acked:1

Humm maybe one of the conditions used in tcp_tsq_write() does not hold...

if (tp->lost_out > tp->retrans_out &&
    tp->snd_cwnd > tcp_packets_in_flight(tp)) {
    tcp_mstamp_refresh(tp);
    tcp_xmit_retransmit_queue(sk);
}

Maybe FastOpen case is 'special' and tp->lost_out is wrong.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help