On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:26:22 +0100
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [off-list ref] wrote:
Björn Töpel [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On 2021-02-26 12:40, Björn Töpel wrote:
quoted
On 2021-02-26 12:37, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
(That last paragraph above is why I asked if you updated the performance
numbers in the cover letter; removing an additional function call should
affect those, right?)
Yeah, it should. Let me spend some more time benchmarking on the DEVMAP
scenario.
I did a re-measure using samples/xdp_redirect_map.
The setup is 64B packets blasted to an i40e. As a baseline,
# xdp_rxq_info --dev ens801f1 --action XDP_DROP
gives 24.8 Mpps.
Now, xdp_redirect_map. Same NIC, two ports, receive from port A,
redirect to port B:
baseline: 14.3 Mpps
this series: 15.4 Mpps
which is almost 8%!
Or 5 ns difference:
10**9/(14.3*10**6) - 10**9/(15.4*10**6)
4.995004995005004
Nice :)
Yes, this is a very significant improvement at this zoom-in
benchmarking level :-)
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer