Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 3 authors, 2021-02-18

Re: possible deadlock in mptcp_push_pending

From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: 2021-02-18 14:58:36
Also in: lkml, mptcp

On Wed, 2021-02-17 at 09:31 -0800, syzbot wrote:
syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    c48f8607 Merge branch 'PTP-for-DSA-tag_ocelot_8021q'
git tree:       net-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=16525cb0d00000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=dbc1ca9e55dc1f9f
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d1b1723faccb7a43f6d1

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+d1b1723faccb7a43f6d1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.11.0-rc7-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor.1/15600 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888057303220 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1598 [inline]
ffff888057303220 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_push_pending+0x28b/0x650 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1466
Even this one is suspected to be a dup of 'WARNING in dst_release': the
subflow socket lock family is reported to be 'sk_lock-AF_INET6', but
subflows are created in kernel, and get 'k-sk_lock-AF_INET6'. This
looks like [re]use after free, likely via msk->first, as in the
suspected dup issue. Lacking a repro, I'm not 110% sure.

@Dmitry, I'm wondering which is the preferred course of action here:
tentatively marking this one as a dup, or leaving it alone till we get
a reproducer?

Thanks!

Paolo
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help