Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] vdpa/mlx5: defer clear_virtqueues to until DRIVER_OK
From: Jason Wang <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-18 07:27:28
Also in:
lkml, virtualization
On 2021/2/18 上午5:55, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
On 2/16/2021 7:21 AM, Eli Cohen wrote:quoted
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 09:33:14AM +0200, Eli Cohen wrote:quoted
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 01:48:00PM -0800, Si-Wei Liu wrote:quoted
While virtq is stopped, get_vq_state() is supposed to be called to get sync'ed with the latest internal avail_index from device. The saved avail_index is used to restate the virtq once device is started. Commit b35ccebe3ef7 introduced the clear_virtqueues() routine to reset the saved avail_index, however, the index gets cleared a bit earlier before get_vq_state() tries to read it. This would cause consistency problems when virtq is restarted, e.g. through a series of link down and link up events. We could defer the clearing of avail_index to until the device is to be started, i.e. until VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK is set again in set_status(). Fixes: b35ccebe3ef7 ("vdpa/mlx5: Restore the hardware used index after change map") Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <redacted> Acked-by: Jason Wang <redacted>Acked-by: Eli Cohen <redacted>I take it back. I think we don't need to clear the indexes at all. In case we need to restore indexes we'll get the right values through set_vq_state(). If we suspend the virtqueue due to VM being suspended, qemu will query first and will provide the the queried value. In case of VM reboot, it will provide 0 in set_vq_state(). I am sending a patch that addresses both reboot and suspend.With set_vq_state() repurposed to restoring used_index I'm fine with this approach. Do I have to repost a v3 of this series while dropping the 3rd patch? -Siwei
Yes, please. Thanks