Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

Hi Davide,

On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 12:35:37 +0100 Davide Caratti [off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, 2021-02-15 at 12:01 +0100, Guillaume Nault wrote:

quoted

Before these commits, ALL_TESTS listed the tests in the order they were
implemented in the rest of the file. So I'd rather continue following
this implicit rule, if at all possible. Also it makes sense to keep
grouping all match_ip_*_test together.  

yes, it makes sense. I can follow-up with a commit for net-next (when
tree re-opens), where the "ordering" in ALL_TESTS is restored. Ok?

The ordering is not set in stone yet (I have only done the merge in the
linux-next tree), just make sure that Dave knows what it should look
like when he merges the net and net-next trees.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell