Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/9] net: phy: icplus: split IP101A/G driver
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-02-10 17:18:39
Also in:
lkml
On 10.02.2021 17:47, Michael Walle wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Unfortunately, the IP101A and IP101G share the same PHY identifier. While most of the functions are somewhat backwards compatible, there is for example the APS_EN bit on the IP101A but on the IP101G this bit reserved. Also, the IP101G has many more functionalities. Deduce the model by accessing the page select register which - according to the datasheet - is not available on the IP101A. If this register is writable, assume we have an IP101G. Split the combined IP101A/G driver into two separate drivers. Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <redacted> --- Changes since v1: - use match_phy_device() as suggested by Heiner Andrew, I've dropped your Reviewed-by because of this. drivers/net/phy/icplus.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/icplus.c b/drivers/net/phy/icplus.c index 036bac628b11..1bc9baa9048f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/phy/icplus.c +++ b/drivers/net/phy/icplus.c@@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); #define IP101A_G_IRQ_DUPLEX_CHANGE BIT(1) #define IP101A_G_IRQ_LINK_CHANGE BIT(0) +#define IP101G_PAGE_CONTROL 0x14 +#define IP101G_PAGE_CONTROL_MASK GENMASK(4, 0) #define IP101G_DIGITAL_IO_SPEC_CTRL 0x1d #define IP101G_DIGITAL_IO_SPEC_CTRL_SEL_INTR32 BIT(2)@@ -301,6 +303,58 @@ static irqreturn_t ip101a_g_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev) return IRQ_HANDLED; } +static int ip101a_g_has_page_register(struct phy_device *phydev) +{ + int oldval, val, ret; + + oldval = phy_read(phydev, IP101G_PAGE_CONTROL); + if (oldval < 0) + return oldval; + + ret = phy_write(phydev, IP101G_PAGE_CONTROL, 0xffff); + if (ret) + return ret; + + val = phy_read(phydev, IP101G_PAGE_CONTROL); + if (val < 0) + return val; + + ret = phy_write(phydev, IP101G_PAGE_CONTROL, oldval); + if (ret) + return ret; + + return val == IP101G_PAGE_CONTROL_MASK; +} + +static int ip101a_g_match_phy_device(struct phy_device *phydev, bool ip101a) +{ + int ret; + + if (phydev->phy_id != IP101A_PHY_ID) + return 0; + + /* The IP101A and the IP101G share the same PHY identifier.The IP101G + * seems to be a successor of the IP101A and implements more functions. + * Amongst other things there is a page select register, which is not + * available on the IP101A. Use this to distinguish these two. + */ + ret = ip101a_g_has_page_register(phydev); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + return (ip101a) ? !ret : ret;
Simpler would be: return ip101a == !ret;
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+} + +static int ip101a_match_phy_device(struct phy_device *phydev) +{ + return ip101a_g_match_phy_device(phydev, true); +} + +static int ip101g_match_phy_device(struct phy_device *phydev) +{ + return ip101a_g_match_phy_device(phydev, false); +} + static struct phy_driver icplus_driver[] = { { PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(IP175C_PHY_ID),@@ -320,8 +374,19 @@ static struct phy_driver icplus_driver[] = { .suspend = genphy_suspend, .resume = genphy_resume, }, { - PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT(IP101A_PHY_ID), - .name = "ICPlus IP101A/G", + .name = "ICPlus IP101A", + .match_phy_device = ip101a_match_phy_device, + /* PHY_BASIC_FEATURES */
These comments have once been automatically added as part of a change in phy_driver structure. For new drivers they don't make too much sense.
+ .probe = ip101a_g_probe,
+ .config_intr = ip101a_g_config_intr,
+ .handle_interrupt = ip101a_g_handle_interrupt,
+ .config_init = ip101a_g_config_init,
+ .soft_reset = genphy_soft_reset,
+ .suspend = genphy_suspend,
+ .resume = genphy_resume,
+}, {
+ .name = "ICPlus IP101G",
+ .match_phy_device = ip101g_match_phy_device,
/* PHY_BASIC_FEATURES */
.probe = ip101a_g_probe,
.config_intr = ip101a_g_config_intr,