On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 08:42:36PM +0530, Calvin Johnson wrote:

+int fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy(struct mii_bus *bus,
+				struct fwnode_handle *child, u32 addr)
+{
+	struct mii_timestamper *mii_ts;

If you initialise this to NULL...

+	struct phy_device *phy;
+	bool is_c45 = false;
+	u32 phy_id;
+	int rc;
+
+	if (is_of_node(child)) {
+		mii_ts = of_find_mii_timestamper(to_of_node(child));
+		if (IS_ERR(mii_ts))
+			return PTR_ERR(mii_ts);
+	}
+
+	rc = fwnode_property_match_string(child, "compatible", "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45");
+	if (rc >= 0)
+		is_c45 = true;
+
+	if (is_c45 || fwnode_get_phy_id(child, &phy_id))
+		phy = get_phy_device(bus, addr, is_c45);
+	else
+		phy = phy_device_create(bus, addr, phy_id, 0, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
+		if (mii_ts && is_of_node(child))

Then you don't need is_of_node() here.

+		/* phy->mii_ts may already be defined by the PHY driver. A
+		 * mii_timestamper probed via the device tree will still have
+		 * precedence.
+		 */
+		if (mii_ts)
+			phy->mii_ts = mii_ts;

Should this be moved out of the if() case?

I'm thinking of the future where we may end up adding mii timestamper
support for ACPI.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!