On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 5:40 PM Xu Jia [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Prefer 'static const' over 'const static' here
Signed-off-by: Xu Jia <redacted>
---
kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
index 1622a44d1617..75b1c678d558 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ BPF_CALL_2(bpf_bprm_opts_set, struct linux_binprm *, bprm, u64, flags)
BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(bpf_bprm_opts_set_btf_ids, struct, linux_binprm)
-const static struct bpf_func_proto bpf_bprm_opts_set_proto = {
+static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_bprm_opts_set_proto = {
I totally agree that it's more canonical this way, but I don't think
such git history noise
is worth it.