On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 07:16:17 -0800
Randy Dunlap [off-list ref] wrote:
On 2/2/21 10:38 PM, samirweng1979 wrote:
quoted
From: wengjianfeng <redacted>
remove duplicate word 'we' in comment
Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <redacted>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c index
c861811..7158152 100644 ---
a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c +++
b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c @@ -179,7
+179,7 @@ void rt2x00crypto_rx_insert_iv(struct sk_buff *skb,
* Make room for new data. There are 2 possibilities
* either the alignment is already present between
* the 802.11 header and payload. In that case we
- * we have to move the header less then the iv_len
+ * have to move the header less then the iv_len
s/then/than/
quoted
* since we can use the already available l2pad bytes
* for the iv data.
* When the alignment must be added manually we must
Hi Randy,
So you means add it for byte alignment, right? if yes,just ignore
the patch. thanks.