Thread (7 messages) flat view 7 messages, 3 authors, 2021-02-01

Re: corrupted pvqspinlock in htab_map_update_elem

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2021-02-01 11:24:43
Also in: bpf, lkml

On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 10:50:58AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted
 queued_spin_unlock arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h:56 [inline]
 lockdep_unlock+0x10e/0x290 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:124
 debug_locks_off_graph_unlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:165 [inline]
 print_usage_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3710 [inline]
Ha, I think you hit a bug in lockdep.
Something like so I suppose.

---
Subject: locking/lockdep: Avoid unmatched unlock
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Mon Feb 1 11:55:38 CET 2021

Commit f6f48e180404 ("lockdep: Teach lockdep about "USED" <- "IN-NMI"
inversions") overlooked that print_usage_bug() releases the graph_lock
and called it without the graph lock held.

Fixes: f6f48e180404 ("lockdep: Teach lockdep about "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions")
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -3773,7 +3773,7 @@ static void
 print_usage_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
 		enum lock_usage_bit prev_bit, enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
 {
-	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
+	if (!debug_locks_off() || debug_locks_silent)
 		return;
 
 	pr_warn("\n");
@@ -3814,6 +3814,7 @@ valid_state(struct task_struct *curr, st
 	    enum lock_usage_bit new_bit, enum lock_usage_bit bad_bit)
 {
 	if (unlikely(hlock_class(this)->usage_mask & (1 << bad_bit))) {
+		graph_unlock()
 		print_usage_bug(curr, this, bad_bit, new_bit);
 		return 0;
 	}
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help