Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: dsa: add support for offloading HSR
From: George McCollister <george.mccollister@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-02-08 17:28:24
On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 5:29 PM Vladimir Oltean [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:59:25PM -0600, George McCollister wrote:quoted
@@ -1935,6 +1936,19 @@ static int dsa_slave_changeupper(struct net_device *dev, dsa_port_lag_leave(dp, info->upper_dev); err = NOTIFY_OK; } + } else if (is_hsr_master(info->upper_dev)) { + if (info->linking) { + err = dsa_port_hsr_join(dp, info->upper_dev); + if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->info.extack, + "Offloading not supported"); + err = 0; + } + err = notifier_from_errno(err); + } else { + dsa_port_hsr_leave(dp, info->upper_dev); + err = NOTIFY_OK; + } }[..]quoted
+static int dsa_switch_hsr_join(struct dsa_switch *ds, + struct dsa_notifier_hsr_info *info) +{ + if (ds->index == info->sw_index && ds->ops->port_hsr_join) + return ds->ops->port_hsr_join(ds, info->port, info->hsr); + + return 0; +} + +static int dsa_switch_hsr_leave(struct dsa_switch *ds, + struct dsa_notifier_hsr_info *info) +{ + if (ds->index == info->sw_index && ds->ops->port_hsr_leave) + ds->ops->port_hsr_leave(ds, info->port, info->hsr); + + return 0; +} +If you return zero, the software fallback is never going to kick in.
For join and leave? How is this not a problem for the bridge and lag functions? They work the same way don't they? I figured it would be safe to follow what they were doing.