Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2021-02-06

Re: [PATCH net v3] net/sched: cls_flower: Reject invalid ct_state flags rules

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-02-06 20:52:20

On Fri,  5 Feb 2021 15:07:30 +0800 wenxu@ucloud.cn wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: wenxu <redacted>

Reject the unsupported and invalid ct_state flags of cls flower rules.

Fixes: e0ace68af2ac ("net/sched: cls_flower: Add matching on conntrack info")
Signed-off-by: wenxu <redacted>
---
v3: using NLA_POLICY_MASK and NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR

 include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h |  7 +++++++
 net/sched/cls_flower.c       | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h b/include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h
index ee95f42..77df582 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h
@@ -591,8 +591,15 @@ enum {
 	TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_ESTABLISHED = 1 << 1, /* Part of an existing connection. */
 	TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_RELATED = 1 << 2, /* Related to an established connection. */
 	TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_TRACKED = 1 << 3, /* Conntrack has occurred. */
+
+	__TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_MAX,
 };
 
+#define TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_MAX \
+		((__TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_MAX - 1) << 1)
+#define TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_MASK \
+		(TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_MAX - 1)
This calculation is rather complicated, sorry I missed this the first
time around. And I don't think it needs to be in the uAPI.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 enum {
 	TCA_FLOWER_KEY_ENC_OPTS_UNSPEC,
 	TCA_FLOWER_KEY_ENC_OPTS_GENEVE, /* Nested
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_flower.c b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
index 84f9325..4aebf4e 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_flower.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
@@ -30,6 +30,9 @@
 
 #include <uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h>
We can add a define here:

#define TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_MASK (TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_NEW | \
				       TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_ESTABLISHED
				       ...
+#define TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_STATE_MASK_TYPE \
+			NLA_POLICY_MASK(NLA_U16, TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_MASK)
nit: using a define for policy is also uncommon AFAIK..
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 struct fl_flow_key {
 	struct flow_dissector_key_meta meta;
 	struct flow_dissector_key_control control;
@@ -687,7 +690,7 @@ static void *fl_get(struct tcf_proto *tp, u32 handle)
 	[TCA_FLOWER_KEY_ENC_OPTS]	= { .type = NLA_NESTED },
 	[TCA_FLOWER_KEY_ENC_OPTS_MASK]	= { .type = NLA_NESTED },
 	[TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_STATE]	= { .type = NLA_U16 },
-	[TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_STATE_MASK]	= { .type = NLA_U16 },
+	[TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_STATE_MASK]	= TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_STATE_MASK_TYPE,
.. if the line would be long just go to the next one:

	[TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_STATE_MASK]	= 
		NLA_POLICY_MASK(NLA_U16, TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_MASK)
 	[TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_ZONE]	= { .type = NLA_U16 },
 	[TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_ZONE_MASK]	= { .type = NLA_U16 },
 	[TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_MARK]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help