Re: [PATCH 2/2] bpf_encoder: Translate SHN_XINDEX in symbol's st_shndx values
From: Jiri Olsa <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-22 21:16:47
Also in:
bpf
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 12:16:42PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:46 AM Jiri Olsa [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
For very large ELF objects (with many sections), we could get special value SHN_XINDEX (65535) for symbol's st_shndx. This patch is adding code to detect the optional extended section index table and use it to resolve symbol's section index. Adding elf_symtab__for_each_symbol_index macro that returns symbol's section index and usign it in collect functions. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> --- btf_encoder.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- elf_symtab.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- elf_symtab.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)diff --git a/btf_encoder.c b/btf_encoder.c index 5557c9efd365..56ee55965093 100644 --- a/btf_encoder.c +++ b/btf_encoder.c@@ -63,13 +63,13 @@ static void delete_functions(void) #define max(x, y) ((x) < (y) ? (y) : (x)) #endif -static int collect_function(struct btf_elf *btfe, GElf_Sym *sym) +static int collect_function(struct btf_elf *btfe, GElf_Sym *sym, + Elf32_Word sym_sec_idx)nit: we use size_t or int for this, no need for libelf types here, imo
ok
quoted
{ struct elf_function *new; static GElf_Shdr sh; - static int last_idx; + static Elf32_Word last_idx; const char *name; - int idx; if (elf_sym__type(sym) != STT_FUNC) return 0;@@ -90,12 +90,10 @@ static int collect_function(struct btf_elf *btfe, GElf_Sym *sym) functions = new; } - idx = elf_sym__section(sym); - - if (idx != last_idx) { - if (!elf_section_by_idx(btfe->elf, &sh, idx)) + if (sym_sec_idx != last_idx) { + if (!elf_section_by_idx(btfe->elf, &sh, sym_sec_idx)) return 0; - last_idx = idx; + last_idx = sym_sec_idx; } functions[functions_cnt].name = name;@@ -542,14 +540,15 @@ static bool percpu_var_exists(uint64_t addr, uint32_t *sz, const char **name) return true; } -static int collect_percpu_var(struct btf_elf *btfe, GElf_Sym *sym) +static int collect_percpu_var(struct btf_elf *btfe, GElf_Sym *sym, + Elf32_Word sym_sec_idx)nit: same, size_t or just int would be finequoted
{ const char *sym_name; uint64_t addr; uint32_t size; /* compare a symbol's shndx to determine if it's a percpu variable */ - if (elf_sym__section(sym) != btfe->percpu_shndx) + if (sym_sec_idx != btfe->percpu_shndx) return 0; if (elf_sym__type(sym) != STT_OBJECT) return 0;@@ -585,12 +584,13 @@ static int collect_percpu_var(struct btf_elf *btfe, GElf_Sym *sym) return 0; } -static void collect_symbol(GElf_Sym *sym, struct funcs_layout *fl) +static void collect_symbol(GElf_Sym *sym, struct funcs_layout *fl, + Elf32_Word sym_sec_idx) { if (!fl->mcount_start && !strcmp("__start_mcount_loc", elf_sym__name(sym, btfe->symtab))) { fl->mcount_start = sym->st_value; - fl->mcount_sec_idx = sym->st_shndx; + fl->mcount_sec_idx = sym_sec_idx; } if (!fl->mcount_stop &&@@ -598,9 +598,36 @@ static void collect_symbol(GElf_Sym *sym, struct funcs_layout *fl) fl->mcount_stop = sym->st_value; } +static bool elf_sym__get(Elf_Data *syms, Elf_Data *syms_sec_idx_table, + int id, GElf_Sym *sym, Elf32_Word *sym_sec_idx)This is a generic function, why don't you want to move it into elf_symtab.h?quoted
+{ + if (!gelf_getsym(syms, id, sym)) + return false; + + *sym_sec_idx = sym->st_shndx; + + if (sym->st_shndx == SHN_XINDEX) { + if (!syms_sec_idx_table) + return false; + if (!gelf_getsymshndx(syms, syms_sec_idx_table, + id, sym, sym_sec_idx)) + return false;You also ignored my feedback about not fetching symbol twice. Why?
ugh, I did not read your last 2 comments.. let me check that, sry
quoted
+ } + + return true; +} + +#define elf_symtab__for_each_symbol_index(symtab, id, sym, sym_sec_idx) \ + for (id = 0; \ + id < symtab->nr_syms && \ + elf_sym__get(symtab->syms, symtab->syms_sec_idx_table, \ + id, &sym, &sym_sec_idx); \ + id++)This should be in elf_symtab.h next to elf_symtab__for_each_symbol. And thinking a bit more, the variant with just ignoring symbols that we failed to get is probably a safer alternative. I.e., currently there is no way to communicate that we terminated iteration with error, so it's probably better to skip failed symbols and still get the rest, no? I was hoping to discuss stuff like this on the previous version of the patch...
I was thinking of that, but then I thought it's better to fail, than have possibly wrong data in BTF, because the ELF data is possibly damaged? no idea.. so I took the safer way jirka