Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/4] net: introduce common dev_page_is_reserved()

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:39:07 -0800

On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:11:23 +0000 Alexander Lobakin wrote:

quoted

+ * dev_page_is_reserved - check whether a page can be reused for network Rx
+ * @page: the page to test
+ *
+ * A page shouldn't be considered for reusing/recycling if it was allocated
+ * under memory pressure or at a distant memory node.
+ *
+ * Returns true if this page should be returned to page allocator, false
+ * otherwise.
+ */
+static inline bool dev_page_is_reserved(const struct page *page)

Am I the only one who feels like "reusable" is a better term than
"reserved".

I thought about it, but this will need to inverse the conditions in
most of the drivers. I decided to keep it as it is.
I can redo if "reusable" is preferred.

Regarding "no objectives to take patch 1 through net-next": patches
2-3 depend on it, so I can't put it in a separate series.

Thanks,
Al