[PATCH bpf-next] bpf: change 'BPF_ADD' to 'BPF_AND' in print_bpf_insn()
From: <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-27 04:06:15
Also in:
bpf, lkml
Subsystem:
bpf [general] (safe dynamic programs and tools), bpf [tooling] (bpftool), the rest · Maintainers:
Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Quentin Monnet, Linus Torvalds
From: Menglong Dong <redacted>
This 'BPF_ADD' is duplicated, and I belive it should be 'BPF_AND'.
Fixes: 981f94c3e921 ("bpf: Add bitwise atomic instructions")
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <redacted>
---
kernel/bpf/disasm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
index 19ff8fed7f4b..3acc7e0b6916 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, insn->src_reg); else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC && - (insn->imm == BPF_ADD || insn->imm == BPF_ADD || + (insn->imm == BPF_ADD || insn->imm == BPF_AND || insn->imm == BPF_OR || insn->imm == BPF_XOR)) { verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) lock *(%s *)(r%d %+d) %s r%d\n", insn->code,
--
2.25.1