Thread (9 messages) flat view 9 messages, 4 authors, 2021-01-25

Re: [PATCH net] net: mrp: use stp state as substitute for unimplemented mrp state

From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Date: 2021-01-18 18:59:10
Also in: bridge, lkml

The 01/18/2021 19:13, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
Hi Rasmus,
When using MRP with hardware that does understand the concept of
blocked or forwarding ports, but not the full MRP offload, we
currently fail to tell the hardware what state it should put the port
in when the ring is closed - resulting in a ring of forwarding ports
and all the trouble that comes with that.
But why don't you implement the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_MRP_PORT_STATE in your
driver? if already the HW understands the concept of block or forwarding?
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <redacted>
---

I don't really understand why SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_MRP_PORT_STATE even
has to exist seperately from SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_STP_STATE, and
it's hard to tell what the difference might be since no kernel code
implements the former.
The reason was to stay away from STP, because you can't run these two
protocols at the same time. Even though in SW, we reuse port's state.
In our driver(which is not upstreamed), we currently implement
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_MRP_PORT_STATE and just call the
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_STP_STATE.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 net/bridge/br_mrp_switchdev.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_mrp_switchdev.c b/net/bridge/br_mrp_switchdev.c
index ed547e03ace1..8a1c7953e57a 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_mrp_switchdev.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_mrp_switchdev.c
@@ -180,6 +180,24 @@ int br_mrp_port_switchdev_set_state(struct net_bridge_port *p,
        int err;

        err = switchdev_port_attr_set(p->dev, &attr);
+       if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
+               attr.id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_STP_STATE;
+               switch (state) {
+               case BR_MRP_PORT_STATE_DISABLED:
+               case BR_MRP_PORT_STATE_NOT_CONNECTED:
+                       attr.u.stp_state = BR_STATE_DISABLED;
+                       break;
+               case BR_MRP_PORT_STATE_BLOCKED:
+                       attr.u.stp_state = BR_STATE_BLOCKING;
+                       break;
+               case BR_MRP_PORT_STATE_FORWARDING:
+                       attr.u.stp_state = BR_STATE_FORWARDING;
+                       break;
+               default:
+                       return err;
+               };
+               err = switchdev_port_attr_set(p->dev, &attr);
+       }
        if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
                br_warn(p->br, "error setting offload MRP state on port %u(%s)\n",
                        (unsigned int)p->port_no, p->dev->name);
--
2.23.0
-- 
/Horatiu
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help