Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests: bpf: Add a new test for bare tracepoints
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-13 16:41:42
Also in:
bpf, lkml
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 10:21:31AM +0000, Qais Yousef wrote:
On 01/12/21 12:07, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
$ sudo ./test_progs -v -t module_attachuse -vv when debugging stuff like that with test_progs, it will output libbpf detailed logs, that often are very helpfulI tried that but it didn't help me. Full output is here https://paste.debian.net/1180846It did help a bit for me to make sure that you have bpf_testmod properly loaded and its BTF was found, so the problem is somewhere else. Also, given load succeeded and attach failed with OPNOTSUPP, I suspect you are missing some of FTRACE configs, which seems to be missing from selftests's config as well. Check that you have CONFIG_FTRACE=y and CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE=y, and you might need some more. See [0] for a real config we are using to run all tests in libbpf CI. If you figure out what you were missing, please also contribute a patch to selftests' config. [0] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/blob/master/travis-ci/vmtest/configs/latest.configYeah that occurred to me too. I do have all necessary FTRACE options enabled, including DYNAMIC_FTRACE. I think I did try enabling fault injection too just in case. I have CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION=y and CONFIG_FUNCTION_ERROR_INJECTION=y.
Could it come from lack of fentry support on arm64 (or are you testing on x86?) Since the arm64 JIT doesn't have trampoline support at the moment, a lot of bpf selftests fail with ENOTSUPP. Thanks, Jean