Re: [PATCH] Signed-off-by: giladreti <gilad.reti@gmail.com>
flat view
From: Gilad Reti <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-11 16:05:34
Also in:
bpf, lkml
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021, 17:55 Daniel Borkmann [off-list ref] wrote:
Hello Gilad, On 1/11/21 4:31 PM, giladreti wrote:quoted
Added support for pointer to mem register spilling, to allow the verifier to track pointer to valid memory addresses. Such pointers are returned for example by a successful call of the bpf_ringbuf_reserve helper. This patch was suggested as a solution by Yonghong Song.The SoB should not be in subject line but as part of the commit message instead and with proper name, e.g. Signed-off-by: Gilad Reti <redacted> For subject line, please use a short summary that fits the patch prefixed with the subsystem "bpf: [...]", see also [0] as an example. Thanks. It would be good if you could also add a BPF selftest for this [1]. [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/commit/?id=e22d7f05e445165e58feddb4e40cc9c0f94453bc [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c
Sure. Thanks for your guidance. As you can probably tell, I am new to kernel code contribution (in fact this is a first time for me). Should I try to submit this patch again? Sorry in advance for all the overhead I may be causing to you...
quoted
--- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 17270b8404f1..36af69fac591 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c@@ -2217,6 +2217,8 @@ static bool is_spillable_regtype(enum bpf_reg_type type) case PTR_TO_RDWR_BUF: case PTR_TO_RDWR_BUF_OR_NULL: case PTR_TO_PERCPU_BTF_ID: + case PTR_TO_MEM: + case PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL: return true; default: return false;