Hi Jon,
This series have three parts:
1) 10 remaining fixup patches from the series I sent back on Dec, 1st:
parport: fix a kernel-doc markup
rapidio: fix kernel-doc a markup
fs: fix kernel-doc markups
pstore/zone: fix a kernel-doc markup
firmware: stratix10-svc: fix kernel-doc markups
connector: fix a kernel-doc markup
lib/crc7: fix a kernel-doc markup
memblock: fix kernel-doc markups
w1: fix a kernel-doc markup
selftests: kselftest_harness.h: partially fix kernel-doc markups
2) The patch adding the new check to ensure that the kernel-doc
markup will be used for the right declaration;
3) 5 additional patches, produced against next-20210114 with new
problems detected after the original series:
net: tip: fix a couple kernel-doc markups
net: cfg80211: fix a kerneldoc markup
reset: core: fix a kernel-doc markup
drm: drm_crc: fix a kernel-doc markup
platform/surface: aggregator: fix a kernel-doc markup
It probably makes sense to merge at least the first 11 patches
via the doc tree, as they should apply cleanly there, and
having the last 5 patches merged via each maintainer's tree.
-
Kernel-doc has always be limited to a probably bad documented
rule:
The kernel-doc markups should appear *imediatelly before* the
function or data structure that it documents.
On other words, if a C file would contain something like this:
/**
* foo - function foo
* @args: foo args
*/
static inline void bar(int args);
/**
* bar - function bar
* @args: foo args
*/
static inline void foo(void *args);
The output (in ReST format) will be:
.. c:function:: void bar (int args)
function foo
**Parameters**
``int args``
foo args
.. c:function:: void foo (void *args)
function bar
**Parameters**
``void *args``
foo args
Which is clearly a wrong result. Before this changeset,
not even a warning is produced on such cases.
As placing such markups just before the documented
data is a common practice, on most cases this is fine.
However, as patches touch things, identifiers may be
renamed, and people may forget to update the kernel-doc
markups to follow such changes.
This has been happening for quite a while, as there are
lots of files with kernel-doc problems.
This series address those issues and add a file at the
end that will enforce that the identifier will match the
kernel-doc markup, avoiding this problem from
keep happening as time goes by.
This series is based on current upstream tree.
@maintainers: feel free to pick the patches and
apply them directly on your trees, as all patches on
this series are independent from the other ones.
--
v6:
- rebased on the top of next-20210114 and added a few extra fixes
v5:
- The completion.h patch was replaced by another one which drops
an obsolete macro;
- Some typos got fixed and review tags got added;
- Dropped patches that were already merged at linux-next.
v4:
- Patches got rebased and got some acks.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab (16):
parport: fix a kernel-doc markup
rapidio: fix kernel-doc a markup
fs: fix kernel-doc markups
pstore/zone: fix a kernel-doc markup
firmware: stratix10-svc: fix kernel-doc markups
connector: fix a kernel-doc markup
lib/crc7: fix a kernel-doc markup
memblock: fix kernel-doc markups
w1: fix a kernel-doc markup
selftests: kselftest_harness.h: partially fix kernel-doc markups
scripts: kernel-doc: validate kernel-doc markup with the actual names
net: tip: fix a couple kernel-doc markups
net: cfg80211: fix a kerneldoc markup
reset: core: fix a kernel-doc markup
drm: drm_crc: fix a kernel-doc markup
platform/surface: aggregator: fix a kernel-doc markup
drivers/parport/share.c | 2 +-
.../surface/aggregator/ssh_request_layer.c | 2 +-
drivers/rapidio/rio.c | 2 +-
drivers/reset/core.c | 4 +-
fs/dcache.c | 73 ++++++++++---------
fs/inode.c | 4 +-
fs/pstore/zone.c | 2 +-
fs/seq_file.c | 5 +-
fs/super.c | 12 +--
include/drm/drm_crtc.h | 2 +-
include/linux/connector.h | 2 +-
.../firmware/intel/stratix10-svc-client.h | 10 +--
include/linux/memblock.h | 4 +-
include/linux/parport.h | 31 ++++++++
include/linux/w1.h | 2 +-
include/net/cfg80211.h | 2 +-
lib/crc7.c | 2 +-
net/tipc/link.c | 2 +-
net/tipc/node.c | 2 +-
scripts/kernel-doc | 62 ++++++++++++----
tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h | 26 ++++---
21 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
--
2.29.2
A function has a different name between their prototype
and its kernel-doc markup:
../include/net/cfg80211.h:1766: warning: expecting prototype for struct cfg80211_sar_chan_ranges. Prototype was for struct cfg80211_sar_freq_ranges instead
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
---
include/net/cfg80211.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
A function has a different name between their prototype
and its kernel-doc markup:
../net/tipc/link.c:2551: warning: expecting prototype for link_reset_stats(). Prototype was for tipc_link_reset_stats() instead
../net/tipc/node.c:1678: warning: expecting prototype for is the general link level function for message sending(). Prototype was for tipc_node_xmit() instead
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
---
net/tipc/link.c | 2 +-
net/tipc/node.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
From: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com> Date: 2021-01-14 16:01:03
On 1/14/21 3:04 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
quoted hunk
A function has a different name between their prototype
and its kernel-doc markup:
../net/tipc/link.c:2551: warning: expecting prototype for link_reset_stats(). Prototype was for tipc_link_reset_stats() instead
../net/tipc/node.c:1678: warning: expecting prototype for is the general link level function for message sending(). Prototype was for tipc_node_xmit() instead
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
---
net/tipc/link.c | 2 +-
net/tipc/node.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Date: 2021-01-14 18:34:46
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:59:08 -0500 Jon Maloy wrote:
On 1/14/21 3:04 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
quoted
A function has a different name between their prototype
and its kernel-doc markup:
../net/tipc/link.c:2551: warning: expecting prototype for link_reset_stats(). Prototype was for tipc_link_reset_stats() instead
../net/tipc/node.c:1678: warning: expecting prototype for is the general link level function for message sending(). Prototype was for tipc_node_xmit() instead
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
Thanks! Applied this one to net, the cfg80211 one does not apply to
net, so I'll leave it to Johannes.
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date: 2021-01-14 21:24:27
On Thu, 2021-01-14 at 10:34 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:59:08 -0500 Jon Maloy wrote:
quoted
On 1/14/21 3:04 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
quoted
A function has a different name between their prototype
and its kernel-doc markup:
../net/tipc/link.c:2551: warning: expecting prototype for link_reset_stats(). Prototype was for tipc_link_reset_stats() instead
../net/tipc/node.c:1678: warning: expecting prototype for is the general link level function for message sending(). Prototype was for tipc_node_xmit() instead
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
Thanks! Applied this one to net, the cfg80211 one does not apply to
net, so I'll leave it to Johannes.
Right, that was diffed against -next, and I've got a fix pending that I
didn't send yet.
I've applied this now, thanks.
johannes
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Date: 2021-01-21 19:12:40
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:04:36 +0100
Mauro Carvalho Chehab [off-list ref] wrote:
1) 10 remaining fixup patches from the series I sent back on Dec, 1st:
parport: fix a kernel-doc markup
rapidio: fix kernel-doc a markup
fs: fix kernel-doc markups
pstore/zone: fix a kernel-doc markup
firmware: stratix10-svc: fix kernel-doc markups
connector: fix a kernel-doc markup
lib/crc7: fix a kernel-doc markup
memblock: fix kernel-doc markups
w1: fix a kernel-doc markup
selftests: kselftest_harness.h: partially fix kernel-doc markups
A week later none of these have shown up in linux-next, so I went ahead
and applied the set.
Thanks,
jon