Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] nfc: Add a virtual nci device driver
From: Bongsu Jeon <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-27 13:07:04
Also in:
linux-kselftest, oe-linux-nfc
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 10:42 AM Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 18:24:24 +0900 Bongsu Jeon wrote:quoted
From: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@samsung.com> NCI virtual device simulates a NCI device to the user. It can be used to validate the NCI module and applications. This driver supports communication between the virtual NCI device and NCI module. Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>quoted
+static bool virtual_ncidev_check_enabled(void) +{ + bool ret = true; + + mutex_lock(&nci_mutex); + if (state != virtual_ncidev_enabled) + ret = false; + mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex); + + return ret;This can be simplified like: bool ret; mutex_lock() ret = state == virtual_ncidev_enabled; mutex_unlock() return ret;quoted
+} + +static int virtual_nci_open(struct nci_dev *ndev) +{ + return 0; +} + +static int virtual_nci_close(struct nci_dev *ndev) +{ + mutex_lock(&nci_mutex); + if (send_buff) + kfree_skb(send_buff);kfree_skb() handles NULL, no need for the if, you can always call kfree_skb() here
I see, I will remove this.
quoted
+ send_buff = NULL; + mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex); + + return 0; +} + +static int virtual_nci_send(struct nci_dev *ndev, struct sk_buff *skb) +{ + if (virtual_ncidev_check_enabled() == false) + return 0;Shouldn't you check this _under_ the lock below? Otherwise there is a small window between check and use of send_buff
In virtual_ncidev_check_enabled function, mutex is used. I think that virtual_ncidev_check_enabled function isn't necessary after refactoring. So I'll remove it.
quoted
+ mutex_lock(&nci_mutex); + if (send_buff) { + mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex); + return -1; + } + send_buff = skb_copy(skb, GFP_KERNEL); + mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex); + + return 0; +} + +static struct nci_ops virtual_nci_ops = { + .open = virtual_nci_open, + .close = virtual_nci_close, + .send = virtual_nci_send +}; + +static ssize_t virtual_ncidev_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, + size_t count, loff_t *ppos) +{ + size_t actual_len; + + mutex_lock(&nci_mutex); + if (!send_buff) { + mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex); + return 0; + } + + actual_len = min_t(size_t, count, send_buff->len); + + if (copy_to_user(buf, send_buff->data, actual_len)) { + mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex); + return -EFAULT; + } + + skb_pull(send_buff, actual_len); + if (send_buff->len == 0) { + consume_skb(send_buff); + send_buff = NULL; + } + mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex); + + return actual_len; +} + +static ssize_t virtual_ncidev_write(struct file *file, + const char __user *buf, + size_t count, loff_t *ppos) +{ + struct sk_buff *skb; + + skb = alloc_skb(count, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!skb) + return -ENOMEM; + + if (copy_from_user(skb_put(skb, count), buf, count)) { + kfree_skb(skb); + return -EFAULT; + } + + nci_recv_frame(ndev, skb); + return count; +} + +static int virtual_ncidev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +{ + int ret = 0; + + mutex_lock(&nci_mutex); + if (state != virtual_ncidev_disabled) { + mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex); + return -EBUSY; + } + + ndev = nci_allocate_device(&virtual_nci_ops, VIRTUAL_NFC_PROTOCOLS, + 0, 0); + if (!ndev) { + mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + ret = nci_register_device(ndev); + if (ret < 0) { + nci_free_device(ndev); + mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex); + return ret; + } + state = virtual_ncidev_enabled; + mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex); + + return 0; +} + +static int virtual_ncidev_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +{ + mutex_lock(&nci_mutex); + + if (state == virtual_ncidev_enabled) { + state = virtual_ncidev_disabling; + mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex); + + nci_unregister_device(ndev); + nci_free_device(ndev); + + mutex_lock(&nci_mutex); + } + + state = virtual_ncidev_disabled; + mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex); + + return 0; +} + +static long virtual_ncidev_ioctl(struct file *flip, unsigned int cmd, + unsigned long arg) +{ + if (cmd == IOCTL_GET_NCIDEV_IDX) { + struct nfc_dev *nfc_dev = ndev->nfc_dev; + void __user *p = (void __user *)arg; + + if (copy_to_user(p, &nfc_dev->idx, sizeof(nfc_dev->idx))) + return -EFAULT; + } else { + return -ENOTTY; + } + + return 0;Please flip the condition and return early. I think I suggested this already:
Sorry, I didn't misunderstand it. I will change it.
{
struct nfc_dev *nfc_dev = ndev->nfc_dev;
void __user *p = (void __user *)arg;
if (cmd != IOCTL_GET_NCIDEV_IDX)
return -ENOTTY;
if (copy_to_user(p, &nfc_dev->idx, sizeof(nfc_dev->idx)))
return -EFAULT;
return 0;Thank you for your review.