Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 2 authors, 2021-01-27

Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] nfc: Add a virtual nci device driver

From: Bongsu Jeon <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-27 13:07:04
Also in: linux-kselftest, oe-linux-nfc

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 10:42 AM Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 18:24:24 +0900 Bongsu Jeon wrote:
quoted
From: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>

NCI virtual device simulates a NCI device to the user. It can be used to
validate the NCI module and applications. This driver supports
communication between the virtual NCI device and NCI module.

Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>
quoted
+static bool virtual_ncidev_check_enabled(void)
+{
+     bool ret = true;
+
+     mutex_lock(&nci_mutex);
+     if (state != virtual_ncidev_enabled)
+             ret = false;
+     mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex);
+
+     return ret;

This can be simplified like:

        bool ret;

        mutex_lock()
        ret = state == virtual_ncidev_enabled;
        mutex_unlock()

        return ret;

quoted
+}
+
+static int virtual_nci_open(struct nci_dev *ndev)
+{
+     return 0;
+}
+
+static int virtual_nci_close(struct nci_dev *ndev)
+{
+     mutex_lock(&nci_mutex);
+     if (send_buff)
+             kfree_skb(send_buff);
kfree_skb() handles NULL, no need for the if, you can always call
kfree_skb() here
I see, I will remove this.
quoted
+     send_buff = NULL;
+     mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex);
+
+     return 0;
+}
+
+static int virtual_nci_send(struct nci_dev *ndev, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+     if (virtual_ncidev_check_enabled() == false)
+             return 0;
Shouldn't you check this _under_ the lock below?

Otherwise there is a small window between check and use of send_buff
In virtual_ncidev_check_enabled function, mutex is used.
I think that virtual_ncidev_check_enabled function isn't necessary
after refactoring.
So I'll remove it.
quoted
+     mutex_lock(&nci_mutex);
+     if (send_buff) {
+             mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex);
+             return -1;
+     }
+     send_buff = skb_copy(skb, GFP_KERNEL);
+     mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex);
+
+     return 0;
+}
+
+static struct nci_ops virtual_nci_ops = {
+     .open = virtual_nci_open,
+     .close = virtual_nci_close,
+     .send = virtual_nci_send
+};
+
+static ssize_t virtual_ncidev_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
+                                size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+     size_t actual_len;
+
+     mutex_lock(&nci_mutex);
+     if (!send_buff) {
+             mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex);
+             return 0;
+     }
+
+     actual_len = min_t(size_t, count, send_buff->len);
+
+     if (copy_to_user(buf, send_buff->data, actual_len)) {
+             mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex);
+             return -EFAULT;
+     }
+
+     skb_pull(send_buff, actual_len);
+     if (send_buff->len == 0) {
+             consume_skb(send_buff);
+             send_buff = NULL;
+     }
+     mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex);
+
+     return actual_len;
+}
+
+static ssize_t virtual_ncidev_write(struct file *file,
+                                 const char __user *buf,
+                                 size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+     struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+     skb = alloc_skb(count, GFP_KERNEL);
+     if (!skb)
+             return -ENOMEM;
+
+     if (copy_from_user(skb_put(skb, count), buf, count)) {
+             kfree_skb(skb);
+             return -EFAULT;
+     }
+
+     nci_recv_frame(ndev, skb);
+     return count;
+}
+
+static int virtual_ncidev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+     int ret = 0;
+
+     mutex_lock(&nci_mutex);
+     if (state != virtual_ncidev_disabled) {
+             mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex);
+             return -EBUSY;
+     }
+
+     ndev = nci_allocate_device(&virtual_nci_ops, VIRTUAL_NFC_PROTOCOLS,
+                                0, 0);
+     if (!ndev) {
+             mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex);
+             return -ENOMEM;
+     }
+
+     ret = nci_register_device(ndev);
+     if (ret < 0) {
+             nci_free_device(ndev);
+             mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex);
+             return ret;
+     }
+     state = virtual_ncidev_enabled;
+     mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex);
+
+     return 0;
+}
+
+static int virtual_ncidev_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+     mutex_lock(&nci_mutex);
+
+     if (state == virtual_ncidev_enabled) {
+             state = virtual_ncidev_disabling;
+             mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex);
+
+             nci_unregister_device(ndev);
+             nci_free_device(ndev);
+
+             mutex_lock(&nci_mutex);
+     }
+
+     state = virtual_ncidev_disabled;
+     mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex);
+
+     return 0;
+}
+
+static long virtual_ncidev_ioctl(struct file *flip, unsigned int cmd,
+                              unsigned long arg)
+{
+     if (cmd == IOCTL_GET_NCIDEV_IDX) {
+             struct nfc_dev *nfc_dev = ndev->nfc_dev;
+             void __user *p = (void __user *)arg;
+
+             if (copy_to_user(p, &nfc_dev->idx, sizeof(nfc_dev->idx)))
+                     return -EFAULT;
+     } else {
+             return -ENOTTY;
+     }
+
+     return 0;
Please flip the condition and return early. I think I suggested this
already:
Sorry, I didn't misunderstand it.
I will change it.
{
        struct nfc_dev *nfc_dev = ndev->nfc_dev;
        void __user *p = (void __user *)arg;

        if (cmd != IOCTL_GET_NCIDEV_IDX)
                return -ENOTTY;

        if (copy_to_user(p, &nfc_dev->idx, sizeof(nfc_dev->idx)))
                return -EFAULT;

        return 0;
Thank you for your review.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help