Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 5 authors, 2021-02-03

Re: [RFC net-next 2/7] net: bridge: switchdev: Include local flag in FDB notifications

From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-18 21:54:24

On 18/01/2021 23:50, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:39:27PM +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
quoted
Apologies for the multiple emails, but wanted to leave an example:

00:11:22:33:44:55 dev ens16 master bridge permanent

This must always exist and user-space must be able to create it, which
might be against what you want to achieve (no BR_FDB_LOCAL entries with
fdb->dst != NULL).
Can you give me an example of why it would matter that fdb->dst in this
case is set to ens16?
Can you dump it as "dev ens16" without it? :) 
Or alternatively can you send a notification with "dev ens16" without it?

I'm in favor of removing it, but it is risky since some script somewhere might
be searching for it, or some user-space daemon might expect to see a notification
for such entries and react on it.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help