[PATCH net-next,1/3] octeontx2-af: Mailbox changes for 98xx CPT block
From: Srujana Challa <schalla@marvell.com>
Date: 2021-01-13 15:21:42
Subsystem:
marvell octeontx2 rvu admin function driver, networking drivers, the rest · Maintainers:
Sunil Goutham, Ratheesh Kannoth, Geetha sowjanya, Subbaraya Sundeep, Andrew Lunn, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds
This patch changes CPT mailbox message format to
support new block CPT1 in 98xx silicon.
cpt_rd_wr_reg ->
Modify cpt_rd_wr_reg mailbox and its handler to
accommodate new block CPT1.
cpt_lf_alloc ->
Modify cpt_lf_alloc mailbox and its handler to
configure LFs from a block address out of multiple
blocks of same type. If a PF/VF needs to configure
LFs from both the blocks then this mbox should be
called twice.
Signed-off-by: Mahipal Challa <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Srujana Challa <schalla@marvell.com>
---
.../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mbox.h | 2 +
.../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_cpt.c | 41 +++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mbox.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mbox.h
index f919283ddc34..cbbab070f22b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mbox.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mbox.h@@ -1071,6 +1071,7 @@ struct cpt_rd_wr_reg_msg { u64 *ret_val; u64 val; u8 is_write; + int blkaddr; }; struct cpt_lf_alloc_req_msg {
@@ -1078,6 +1079,7 @@ struct cpt_lf_alloc_req_msg { u16 nix_pf_func; u16 sso_pf_func; u16 eng_grpmsk; + int blkaddr; }; #endif /* MBOX_H */
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_cpt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_cpt.c
index 35261d52c997..b6de4b95a72a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_cpt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_cpt.c@@ -65,13 +65,13 @@ int rvu_mbox_handler_cpt_lf_alloc(struct rvu *rvu, int num_lfs, slot; u64 val; + blkaddr = req->blkaddr ? req->blkaddr : BLKADDR_CPT0; + if (blkaddr != BLKADDR_CPT0 && blkaddr != BLKADDR_CPT1) + return -ENODEV; + if (req->eng_grpmsk == 0x0) return CPT_AF_ERR_GRP_INVALID; - blkaddr = rvu_get_blkaddr(rvu, BLKTYPE_CPT, 0); - if (blkaddr < 0) - return blkaddr; - block = &rvu->hw->block[blkaddr]; num_lfs = rvu_get_rsrc_mapcount(rvu_get_pfvf(rvu, pcifunc), block->addr);
@@ -114,23 +114,17 @@ int rvu_mbox_handler_cpt_lf_alloc(struct rvu *rvu, return 0; } -int rvu_mbox_handler_cpt_lf_free(struct rvu *rvu, struct msg_req *req, - struct msg_rsp *rsp) +static int cpt_lf_free(struct rvu *rvu, struct msg_req *req, int blkaddr) { u16 pcifunc = req->hdr.pcifunc; + int num_lfs, cptlf, slot; struct rvu_block *block; - int cptlf, blkaddr; - int num_lfs, slot; - - blkaddr = rvu_get_blkaddr(rvu, BLKTYPE_CPT, 0); - if (blkaddr < 0) - return blkaddr; block = &rvu->hw->block[blkaddr]; num_lfs = rvu_get_rsrc_mapcount(rvu_get_pfvf(rvu, pcifunc), block->addr); if (!num_lfs) - return CPT_AF_ERR_LF_INVALID; + return 0; for (slot = 0; slot < num_lfs; slot++) { cptlf = rvu_get_lf(rvu, block, pcifunc, slot);
@@ -146,6 +140,21 @@ int rvu_mbox_handler_cpt_lf_free(struct rvu *rvu, struct msg_req *req, return 0; } +int rvu_mbox_handler_cpt_lf_free(struct rvu *rvu, struct msg_req *req, + struct msg_rsp *rsp) +{ + int ret; + + ret = cpt_lf_free(rvu, req, BLKADDR_CPT0); + if (ret) + return ret; + + if (is_block_implemented(rvu->hw, BLKADDR_CPT1)) + ret = cpt_lf_free(rvu, req, BLKADDR_CPT1); + + return ret; +} + static bool is_valid_offset(struct rvu *rvu, struct cpt_rd_wr_reg_msg *req) { u64 offset = req->reg_offset;
@@ -208,9 +217,9 @@ int rvu_mbox_handler_cpt_rd_wr_register(struct rvu *rvu, { int blkaddr; - blkaddr = rvu_get_blkaddr(rvu, BLKTYPE_CPT, 0); - if (blkaddr < 0) - return blkaddr; + blkaddr = req->blkaddr ? req->blkaddr : BLKADDR_CPT0; + if (blkaddr != BLKADDR_CPT0 && blkaddr != BLKADDR_CPT1) + return -ENODEV; /* This message is accepted only if sent from CPT PF/VF */ if (!is_cpt_pf(rvu, req->hdr.pcifunc) &&
--
2.29.0