Thread (14 messages) flat view 14 messages, 3 authors, 2021-01-12

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 06/11] selftests: Use separate stdout and stderr buffers in nettest

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-01-12 00:34:19

On Sat,  9 Jan 2021 17:18:47 -0700 David Ahern wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: David Ahern <redacted>

When a single instance of nettest is doing both client and
server modes, stdout and stderr messages can get interlaced
and become unreadable. Allocate a new set of buffers for the
child process handling server mode.

Signed-off-by: David Ahern <redacted>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/nettest.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/nettest.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/nettest.c
index 0e4196027d63..13c74774e357 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/nettest.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/nettest.c
@@ -1705,9 +1705,27 @@ static char *random_msg(int len)
 
 static int ipc_child(int fd, struct sock_args *args)
 {
+	char *outbuf, *errbuf;
+	int rc;
+
+	outbuf = malloc(4096);
+	errbuf = malloc(4096);
+	if (!outbuf || !errbuf) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "server: Failed to allocate buffers for stdout and stderr\n");
+		return 1;
that's a memleak, rc = 1, goto free; ?

Also there's a few uses of fprintf(stderr, .. instead of log_error()
is there a reason for it?

I don't think this is a big deal, I'll apply unless you object in time.
+	}
+
+	setbuffer(stdout, outbuf, 4096);
+	setbuffer(stderr, errbuf, 4096);
+
 	server_mode = 1; /* to tell log_msg in case we are in both_mode */
 
-	return do_server(args, fd);
+	rc = do_server(args, fd);
+
+	free(outbuf);
+	free(errbuf);
+
+	return rc;
 }
 
 static int ipc_parent(int cpid, int fd, struct sock_args *args)
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help