Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 3 authors, 2020-12-20

Re: [PATCH net 2/2] docs: networking: packet_mmap: don't mention PACKET_MMAP

From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-12-17 21:30:14
Also in: linux-doc

On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 2:48 PM Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 18:51:17 +0200 Baruch Siach wrote:
quoted
Before commit 889b8f964f2f ("packet: Kill CONFIG_PACKET_MMAP.") there
used to be a CONFIG_PACKET_MMAP config symbol that depended on
CONFIG_PACKET. The text still refers to PACKET_MMAP as the name of this
feature, implying that it can be disabled. Another naming variant is
"Packet MMAP".

Use "PACKET mmap()" everywhere to unify the terminology. Rephrase the
text the implied mmap() feature disable option.
Should we maybe say AF_PACKET mmap() ?
I don't think that the feature name PACKET_MMAP implies
CONFIG_PACKET_MMAP, or thus that the name is obsolete now that the
latter is.

If it needs a rename, the setsockopt is PACKET_[RT]X_RING. So, if this
needs updating, perhaps PACKET_RING would be suitable. Or TPACKET,
based on the version definitions.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help