Thread (11 messages) read the whole thread 11 messages, 7 authors, 2020-12-14

Re: [PATCH v17 3/3] bus: mhi: Add userspace client interface driver

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-12-12 04:10:00
Also in: linux-arm-msm, lkml

On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 11:37:34 -0600 Dan Williams wrote:
Just to re-iterate: QMI ~= AT commands ~= MBIM (not quite, but same
level)

We already do QMI-over-USB, or AT-over-CDC-ACM. This is QMI-over-MHI.
Why do we need a different QMI-over-X for every X? If you say there 
are already chardev interfaces to configure WWAN why not provide one 
of those?
It's not networking data plane. It's WWAN device configuration.
Ack. Not that network config doesn't fall under networking, but eh.
I wonder - did DaveM ever ack this, or was it just out of his sight
enough, behind the cdev, to never trigger a nack?
There are no current kernel APIs for this, and I really don't think we
want there to be. The API surface is *huge* and we definitely don't
want that in-kernel.
It is what it is today for WWAN. I don't think anyone in the
development community or among users is particularly happy about
the situation. Which makes it rather self evident why there is 
so much apprehension about this patch set. It's going to be 
a user space channel for everything Qualcomm - AI accelerator etc.
Widening the WWAN status quo to more device types.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help