Thread (53 messages) 53 messages, 5 authors, 2020-12-16

Re: [PATCH v1 bpf-next 03/11] tcp: Migrate TCP_ESTABLISHED/TCP_SYN_RECV sockets in accept queues.

From: Martin KaFai Lau <hidden>
Date: 2020-12-05 01:44:24
Also in: bpf, lkml

On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 11:44:10PM +0900, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
[ ... ]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/net/core/sock_reuseport.c b/net/core/sock_reuseport.c
index fd133516ac0e..60d7c1f28809 100644
--- a/net/core/sock_reuseport.c
+++ b/net/core/sock_reuseport.c
@@ -216,9 +216,11 @@ int reuseport_add_sock(struct sock *sk, struct sock *sk2, bool bind_inany)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(reuseport_add_sock);
 
-void reuseport_detach_sock(struct sock *sk)
+struct sock *reuseport_detach_sock(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct sock_reuseport *reuse;
+	struct bpf_prog *prog;
+	struct sock *nsk = NULL;
 	int i;
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&reuseport_lock);
@@ -242,8 +244,12 @@ void reuseport_detach_sock(struct sock *sk)
 
 		reuse->num_socks--;
 		reuse->socks[i] = reuse->socks[reuse->num_socks];
+		prog = rcu_dereference(reuse->prog);
Is it under rcu_read_lock() here?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 
 		if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP) {
+			if (reuse->num_socks && !prog)
+				nsk = i == reuse->num_socks ? reuse->socks[i - 1] : reuse->socks[i];
+
 			reuse->num_closed_socks++;
 			reuse->socks[reuse->max_socks - reuse->num_closed_socks] = sk;
 		} else {
@@ -264,6 +270,8 @@ void reuseport_detach_sock(struct sock *sk)
 		call_rcu(&reuse->rcu, reuseport_free_rcu);
 out:
 	spin_unlock_bh(&reuseport_lock);
+
+	return nsk;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(reuseport_detach_sock);
 
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
index 1451aa9712b0..b27241ea96bd 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
@@ -992,6 +992,36 @@ struct sock *inet_csk_reqsk_queue_add(struct sock *sk,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet_csk_reqsk_queue_add);
 
+void inet_csk_reqsk_queue_migrate(struct sock *sk, struct sock *nsk)
+{
+	struct request_sock_queue *old_accept_queue, *new_accept_queue;
+
+	old_accept_queue = &inet_csk(sk)->icsk_accept_queue;
+	new_accept_queue = &inet_csk(nsk)->icsk_accept_queue;
+
+	spin_lock(&old_accept_queue->rskq_lock);
+	spin_lock(&new_accept_queue->rskq_lock);
I am also not very thrilled on this double spin_lock.
Can this be done in (or like) inet_csk_listen_stop() instead?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+
+	if (old_accept_queue->rskq_accept_head) {
+		if (new_accept_queue->rskq_accept_head)
+			old_accept_queue->rskq_accept_tail->dl_next =
+				new_accept_queue->rskq_accept_head;
+		else
+			new_accept_queue->rskq_accept_tail = old_accept_queue->rskq_accept_tail;
+
+		new_accept_queue->rskq_accept_head = old_accept_queue->rskq_accept_head;
+		old_accept_queue->rskq_accept_head = NULL;
+		old_accept_queue->rskq_accept_tail = NULL;
+
+		WRITE_ONCE(nsk->sk_ack_backlog, nsk->sk_ack_backlog + sk->sk_ack_backlog);
+		WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_ack_backlog, 0);
+	}
+
+	spin_unlock(&new_accept_queue->rskq_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&old_accept_queue->rskq_lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet_csk_reqsk_queue_migrate);
+
 struct sock *inet_csk_complete_hashdance(struct sock *sk, struct sock *child,
 					 struct request_sock *req, bool own_req)
 {
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
index 45fb450b4522..545538a6bfac 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
@@ -681,6 +681,7 @@ void inet_unhash(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo = sk->sk_prot->h.hashinfo;
 	struct inet_listen_hashbucket *ilb = NULL;
+	struct sock *nsk;
 	spinlock_t *lock;
 
 	if (sk_unhashed(sk))
@@ -696,8 +697,12 @@ void inet_unhash(struct sock *sk)
 	if (sk_unhashed(sk))
 		goto unlock;
 
-	if (rcu_access_pointer(sk->sk_reuseport_cb))
-		reuseport_detach_sock(sk);
+	if (rcu_access_pointer(sk->sk_reuseport_cb)) {
+		nsk = reuseport_detach_sock(sk);
+		if (nsk)
+			inet_csk_reqsk_queue_migrate(sk, nsk);
+	}
+
 	if (ilb) {
 		inet_unhash2(hashinfo, sk);
 		ilb->count--;
-- 
2.17.2 (Apple Git-113)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help