Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] "Task_isolation" mode
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date: 2020-12-02 14:03:26
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arch, linux-arm-kernel, lkml
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date: 2020-12-02 14:03:26
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arch, linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 05:40:49PM +0000, Alex Belits wrote:
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 08:36 -0800, Tom Rix wrote:quoted
External Email ------------------------------------------------------------------- --- On 11/23/20 9:42 AM, Alex Belits wrote:quoted
This is an update of task isolation work that was originally done by Chris Metcalf [off-list ref] and maintained by him until November 2017. It is adapted to the current kernel and cleaned up to implement its functionality in a more complete and cleaner manner.I am having problems applying the patchset to today's linux-next. Which kernel should I be using ?The patches are against Linus' tree, in particular, commit a349e4c659609fd20e4beea89e5c4a4038e33a95
Is there any reason to base on that commit in particular? Generally it's preferred that a series is based on a tag (so either a release or an -rc kernel), and that the cover letter explains what the base is. If you can do that in future it'll make the series much easier to work with. Thanks, Mark.