Re: linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with the bpf-next tree

Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] writes:

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the userns tree got a conflict in:

  kernel/bpf/task_iter.c

between commit:

  91b2db27d3ff ("bpf: Simplify task_file_seq_get_next()")

from the bpf-next tree and commit:

  edc52f17257a ("bpf/task_iter: In task_file_seq_get_next use task_lookup_next_fd_rcu")

from the userns tree.

I fixed it up (I think, see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

Thanks.  Reading through the diff that looks right, and it has been already
reported.

Eric