RE: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/8] Socket migration for SO_REUSEPORT.
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <hidden>
Date: 2020-11-19 22:02:15
Also in:
bpf, lkml
From: David Laight <redacted> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:18:24 +0000
From: Kuniyuki Iwashimaquoted
Sent: 17 November 2020 09:40 The SO_REUSEPORT option allows sockets to listen on the same port and to accept connections evenly. However, there is a defect in the current implementation. When a SYN packet is received, the connection is tied to a listening socket. Accordingly, when the listener is closed, in-flight requests during the three-way handshake and child sockets in the accept queue are dropped even if other listeners could accept such connections. This situation can happen when various server management tools restart server (such as nginx) processes. For instance, when we change nginx configurations and restart it, it spins up new workers that respect the new configuration and closes all listeners on the old workers, resulting in in-flight ACK of 3WHS is responded by RST.Can't you do something to stop new connections being queued (like setting the 'backlog' to zero), then carry on doing accept()s for a guard time (or until the queue length is zero) before finally closing the listening socket.
Yes, but with eBPF. There are some ideas suggested and well discussed in the thread below, resulting in that connection draining by eBPF was merged. https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1443313848-751-1-git-send-email-tolga.ceylan@gmail.com/ (local) Also, setting zero to backlog does not work well. https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1447262610.17135.114.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com/ (local) ---8<--- From: Eric Dumazet <redacted> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: Add SO_REUSEPORT_LISTEN_OFF socket option as drain mode Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:23:30 -0800
Actually listen(fd, 0) is not going to work well : For request_sock that were created (by incoming SYN packet) before this listen(fd, 0) call, the 3rd packet (ACK coming from client) would not be able to create a child attached to this listener. sk_acceptq_is_full() test in tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock() would simply drop the thing.
---8<---