Re: [PATCH net-next] net: add in_softirq() debug checking in napi_consume_skb()
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2020-11-19 11:48:22
Also in:
lkml
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2020-11-19 11:48:22
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 05:19:44PM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
On 2020/11/19 0:26, Jakub Kicinski wrote:quoted
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 16:57:57 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 07:43:48AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:quoted
TBH the last sentence I wrote isn't clear even to me at this point ;D Maybe using just the macros from preempt.h - like this? #define lockdep_assert_in_softirq() \ do { \ WARN_ON_ONCE(__lockdep_enabled && \ (!in_softirq() || in_irq() || in_nmi()) \ } while (0)One thing I am not so sure about is the different irq context indicator in preempt.h and lockdep.h, for example lockdep_assert_in_irq() uses this_cpu_read(hardirq_context) in lockdep.h, and in_irq() uses current_thread_info()->preempt_count in preempt.h, if they are the same thing?
Very close, for more regular code they should be the same.