RE: [PATCH V2] fsl/fman: add missing put_devcie() call in fman_port_probe()
From: Madalin Bucur (OSS) <hidden>
Date: 2020-11-06 21:59:10
Also in:
lkml
-----Original Message----- From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Sent: 05 November 2020 03:31 To: Yu Kuai <redacted> Cc: Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@nxp.com>; davem@davemloft.net; Florinel Iordache [off-list ref]; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org; yi.zhang@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] fsl/fman: add missing put_devcie() call in fman_port_probe() On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 19:23:23 +0800 Yu Kuai wrote:quoted
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c@@ -1792,20 +1792,21 @@ static int fman_port_probe(structplatform_device *of_dev)quoted
if (!fm_node) { dev_err(port->dev, "%s: of_get_parent() failed\n", __func__); err = -ENODEV; - goto return_err; + goto free_port; } + of_node_put(port_node); fm_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(fm_node); of_node_put(fm_node); if (!fm_pdev) { err = -EINVAL; - goto return_err; + goto free_port; }This is not right either. I just asked you fix up the order of the error path, not move the of_node_put() in the body of the function. Now you're releasing the reference on the object and still use it after.
If you manage to put together a v3, please also address the typo in the subject (put_devcie). Madalin