Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] net: phy: dp83td510: Add support for the DP83TD510 Ethernet PHY
From: Dan Murphy <hidden>
Date: 2020-11-03 17:24:05
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
Andrew On 11/3/20 11:21 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 11:09:44AM -0600, Dan Murphy wrote:quoted
Hello On 10/30/20 6:03 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:quoted
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:29:50 -0500 Dan Murphy wrote:quoted
The DP83TD510E is an ultra-low power Ethernet physical layer transceiver that supports 10M single pair cable. The device supports both 2.4-V p2p and 1-V p2p output voltage as defined by IEEE 802.3cg 10Base-T1L specfications. These modes can be forced via the device tree or the device is defaulted to auto negotiation to determine the proper p2p voltage. Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <redacted>drivers/net/phy/dp83td510.c:70:11: warning: symbol 'dp83td510_feature_array' was not declared. Should it be static?I did not see this warning. Did you use W=1?I _think_ that one is W=1. All the PHY drivers are W=1 clean, and i want to keep it that way. And i hope to make it the default in a lot of the network code soon.
OK I built with the W=1 before submission I did not see this but I will try some other things.
quoted
quoted
Also this: WARNING: ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code, prefer EOPNOTSUPP #429: FILE: drivers/net/phy/dp83td510.c:371: + return -ENOTSUPP; WARNING: ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code, prefer EOPNOTSUPP #524: FILE: drivers/net/phy/dp83td510.c:466: + return -ENOTSUPP;Same with these warnings how where they reproduced?
Same as above
quoted
quoted
ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '(' #580: FILE: drivers/net/phy/dp83td510.c:522: + if(phydev->autoneg) { ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '(' #588: FILE: drivers/net/phy/dp83td510.c:530: + if(phydev->autoneg) {These look like checkpatch.
These I missed
quoted
quoted
And please try to wrap the code on 80 chars on the non trivial lines:What is the LoC limit for networking just for my clarification and I will align with that.80. I would not be too surprised to see checkpatch getting a patch to set it to 80 for networking code.
OK I will align the lines to 80 then. Dan
Andrew