Re: [PATCH net-next] ip_gre: remove CRC flag from dev features in gre_gso_segment
From: Alexander Duyck <hidden>
Date: 2020-11-20 16:10:52
Also in:
linux-sctp
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 2:23 AM Xin Long [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 1:24 AM Alexander Duyck [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 9:53 PM Xin Long [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 4:35 AM Alexander Duyck [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 1:17 AM Xin Long [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This patch is to let it always do CRC checksum in sctp_gso_segment() by removing CRC flag from the dev features in gre_gso_segment() for SCTP over GRE, just as it does in Commit 527beb8ef9c0 ("udp: support sctp over udp in skb_udp_tunnel_segment") for SCTP over UDP. It could set csum/csum_start in GSO CB properly in sctp_gso_segment() after that commit, so it would do checksum with gso_make_checksum() in gre_gso_segment(), and Commit 622e32b7d4a6 ("net: gre: recompute gre csum for sctp over gre tunnels") can be reverted now. Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> --- net/ipv4/gre_offload.c | 14 +++----------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)diff --git a/net/ipv4/gre_offload.c b/net/ipv4/gre_offload.c index e0a2465..a5935d4 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/gre_offload.c +++ b/net/ipv4/gre_offload.c@@ -15,12 +15,12 @@ static struct sk_buff *gre_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb, netdev_features_t features) { int tnl_hlen = skb_inner_mac_header(skb) - skb_transport_header(skb); - bool need_csum, need_recompute_csum, gso_partial; struct sk_buff *segs = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); u16 mac_offset = skb->mac_header; __be16 protocol = skb->protocol; u16 mac_len = skb->mac_len; int gre_offset, outer_hlen; + bool need_csum, gso_partial; if (!skb->encapsulation) goto out;@@ -41,10 +41,10 @@ static struct sk_buff *gre_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb, skb->protocol = skb->inner_protocol; need_csum = !!(skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_GRE_CSUM); - need_recompute_csum = skb->csum_not_inet; skb->encap_hdr_csum = need_csum; features &= skb->dev->hw_enc_features; + features &= ~NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC; /* segment inner packet. */ segs = skb_mac_gso_segment(skb, features);Why just blindly strip NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC? It seems like it would make more sense if there was an explanation as to why you are stripping the offload. I know there are many NICs that could very easily perform SCTP CRC offload on the inner data as long as they didn't have to offload the outer data. For example the Intel NICs should be able to do it, although when I wrote the code up enabling their offloads I think it is only looking at the outer headers so that might require updating to get it to not use the software fallback. It really seems like we should only be clearing NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC if need_csum is true since we must compute the CRC before we can compute the GRE checksum.Right, it's also what Jakub commented, thanks.quoted
quoted
@@ -99,15 +99,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *gre_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb, } *(pcsum + 1) = 0; - if (need_recompute_csum && !skb_is_gso(skb)) { - __wsum csum; - - csum = skb_checksum(skb, gre_offset, - skb->len - gre_offset, 0); - *pcsum = csum_fold(csum); - } else { - *pcsum = gso_make_checksum(skb, 0); - } + *pcsum = gso_make_checksum(skb, 0); } while ((skb = skb->next)); out: return segs;This change doesn't make much sense to me. How are we expecting gso_make_checksum to be able to generate a valid checksum when we are dealing with a SCTP frame? From what I can tell it looks like it is just setting the checksum to ~0 and checksum start to the transport header which isn't true because SCTP is using a CRC, not a 1's complement checksum, or am I missing something? As such in order to get the gre checksum we would need to compute it over the entire payload data wouldn't we? Has this been tested with an actual GRE tunnel that had checksums enabled? If so was it verified that the GSO frames were actually being segmented at the NIC level and not at the GRE tunnel level?Hi Alex, I think you're looking at net.git? As on net-next.git, sctp_gso_make_checksum() has been fixed to set csum/csum_start properly by Commit 527beb8ef9c0 ("udp: support sctp over udp in skb_udp_tunnel_segment"), so that we compute it over the entire payload data, as you said above:No. I believe the code is still wrong. That is what I was pointing out. The GSO_CB->csum is supposed to be the checksum of the header from csum_start up to the end of the payload. In the case of the 1's complement checksum that is normally the inverse of the pseudo-header checksum. We don't normally compute it and instead assume it since it is offloaded. For a CRC based checksum you would need to compute the checksum over the entire packet since CRC and checksum are very different computations. That is why we were calling skb_checksum in the original code.Hi, Alex, sorry for having confused you, see below.quoted
quoted
@@ -27,7 +27,11 @@ static __le32 sctp_gso_make_checksum(struct sk_buff *skb) { skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE; skb->csum_not_inet = 0; - gso_reset_checksum(skb, ~0); + /* csum and csum_start in GSO CB may be needed to do the UDP + * checksum when it's a UDP tunneling packet. + */ + SKB_GSO_CB(skb)->csum = (__force __wsum)~0; + SKB_GSO_CB(skb)->csum_start = skb_headroom(skb) + skb->len; return sctp_compute_cksum(skb, skb_transport_offset(skb)); }And yes, this patch has been tested with GRE tunnel checksums enabled. (... icsum ocsum). And yes, it was segmented in the lower NIC level, and we can make it by: # ethtool -K gre1 tx-sctp-segmentation on # ethtool -K veth0 tx-sctp-segmentation off (Note: "tx-checksum-sctp" and "gso" are on for both devices) Thanks.I would also turn off Tx and Rx checksum offload on your veth device in order to make certain you aren't falsely sending data across indicating that the checksums are valid when they are not. It might be better if you were to run this over an actual NIC as that could then provide independent verification as it would be a fixed checksum test. I'm still not convinced this is working correctly. Basically a crc32c is not the same thing as a 1's complement checksum so you should need to compute both if you have an SCTP packet tunneled inside a UDP or GRE packet with a checksum. I don't see how computing a crc32c should automatically give you a 1's complement checksum of ~0.On the tx Path [1] below, the sctp crc checksum is calculated in sctp_gso_make_checksum() [a], where it calls *sctp_compute_cksum()* to do that, and as for the code in it: SKB_GSO_CB(skb)->csum = (__force __wsum)~0; SKB_GSO_CB(skb)->csum_start = skb_headroom(skb) + skb->len;
Okay, so I think I know how this is working, but the number of things relied on is ugly. Normally assuming skb_headroom(skb) + skb->len being valid for this would be a non-starter. I was assuming you weren't doing the 1's compliment checksum because you weren't using __skb_checksum to generate it. If I am not mistaken SCTP GSO uses the GSO_BY_FRAGS and apparently none of the frags are using page fragments within the skb. Am I understanding correctly? One thing that would help to address some of my concerns would be to clear instead of set NETIF_F_SG in sctp_gso_segment since your checksum depends on linear skbs.
is prepared for doing 1's complement checksum (for outer UDP/GRE), and used in gre_gso_segment() [b], where it calls gso_make_checksum() to do that when need_csum is set. Note that, here it played a TRICK: I set SKB_GSO_CB->csum_start to the end of this packet and SKB_GSO_CB->csum = ~0 manually, so that in gso_make_checksum() it will do the 1's complement checksum for outer UDP/GRE by summing all packet bits up. See gso_make_checksum() (called by gre_gso_segment()): unsigned char *csum_start = skb_transport_header(skb); int plen = (skb->head + SKB_GSO_CB(skb)->csum_start) - csum_start; /* now plen is from udp header to the END of packet. */ __wsum partial = SKB_GSO_CB(skb)->csum; return csum_fold(csum_partial(csum_start, plen, partial)); So yes, here it does compute both if I have an SCTP packet tunnelled inside a UDP or GRE packet with a checksum.
Assuming you have the payload data in the skb->data section. Normally payload is in page frags. That is why I was concerned. You have to have guarantees in place that there will not be page fragments attached to the skb.
But you're right that "the GSO_CB->csum is supposed to be the checksum of the header from csum_start up to the end of the payload". In this TRICK, csum_start is set to the end of packet, and csum should be set to 0, and I will fix it in sctp_gso_make_checksum(), thanks! - SKB_GSO_CB(skb)->csum = (__force __wsum)~0; + SKB_GSO_CB(skb)->csum = (__force __wsum)0; Does it make sense to you now?
For a 1's compliment checksum ~0 and 0 are the same thing. So that value doesn't matter. The issue as I have pointed out is the fact that you are assuming a linear skb, and I am not certain that is what you will actually get out of the call to skb_segment that you make in sctp_gso_segment.
Path [1]: sctp_gso_segment.cold.6+0x3c/0x87 [sctp] <----- [a] inet_gso_segment+0x152/0x3c0 skb_mac_gso_segment+0xa2/0x110 gre_gso_segment+0x138/0x380 <---- [b] inet_gso_segment+0x152/0x3c0 skb_mac_gso_segment+0xa2/0x110 __skb_gso_segment+0xba/0x160 validate_xmit_skb+0x147/0x300 __dev_queue_xmit+0x569/0x920 ip_finish_output2+0x264/0x570 ip_output+0x6d/0x100 iptunnel_xmit+0x16e/0x200 ip_tunnel_xmit+0x437/0x870 [ip_tunnel] ipgre_xmit+0x17b/0x210 [ip_gre] dev_hard_start_xmit+0xd4/0x200 __dev_queue_xmit+0x78c/0x920 ip_finish_output2+0x194/0x570 ip_output+0x6d/0x100 __ip_queue_xmit+0x15d/0x430 sctp_packet_transmit+0x706/0x9b0 [sctp] sctp_outq_flush+0xd7/0x8d0 [sctp] sctp_cmd_interpreter.isra.21+0x721/0x1a20 [sctp] sctp_do_sm+0xc3/0x2a0 [sctp] sctp_primitive_SEND+0x2f/0x40 [sctp] sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc+0x5fa/0x870 [sctp] sctp_sendmsg+0x692/0x9d0 [sctp] sock_sendmsg+0x54/0x60