Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: not link irqfd with a fake IRQ bypass producer | netdev | Ratatoskr

[PATCH 1/2] KVM: not register a IRQ bypass producer if unsupported or disabled · Zhenzhong Duan <hidden> · 2020-10-19
[PATCH 2/2] KVM: not link irqfd with a fake IRQ bypass producer · Zhenzhong Duan <hidden> · 2020-10-19
Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: not link irqfd with a fake IRQ bypass producer · Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> · 2020-10-20
Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: not link irqfd with a fake IRQ bypass producer · Zhenzhong Duan <hidden> · 2020-10-20
Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: not register a IRQ bypass producer if unsupported or disabled · Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> · 2020-10-20
Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: not register a IRQ bypass producer if unsupported or disabled · Zhenzhong Duan <hidden> · 2020-10-20

Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: not link irqfd with a fake IRQ bypass producer

From: Zhenzhong Duan <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-20 10:12:24
Also in: kvm, lkml

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 2:32 PM Jason Wang [off-list ref] wrote:


On 2020/10/19 下午5:06, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:

quoted

In case failure to setup Post interrupt for an IRQ, it make no sense
to assign irqfd->producer to the producer.

This change makes code more robust.


It's better to describe what issue we will get without this patch.

I didn't see an issue without this patch.

Regards
Zhenzhong