Thread (59 messages) 59 messages, 9 authors, 2022-04-27

Re: [PATCH] [v5] wireless: Initial driver submission for pureLiFi STA devices

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: 2020-10-19 04:55:43
Also in: linux-wireless, lkml

On Mon, 2020-10-19 at 08:47 +0530, Srinivasan Raju wrote:
This introduces the pureLiFi LiFi driver for LiFi-X, LiFi-XC
and LiFi-XL USB devices.
Mostly trivial comments:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/chip.c b/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/chip.c
[]
+int purelifi_chip_set_rate(struct purelifi_chip *chip, u8 rate)
+{
+	int r;
+	static struct purelifi_chip *chip_p;
Isn't chip_p pointless?
+
+	if (chip)
+		chip_p = chip;
+	if (!chip_p)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
chip_p is otherwise unused.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/mac.c
[]
+int purelifi_mac_init_hw(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
+{
+	int r;
+	struct purelifi_mac *mac = purelifi_hw_mac(hw);
+	struct purelifi_chip *chip = &mac->chip;
+
+	r = purelifi_chip_init_hw(chip);
+	if (r) {
+		dev_warn(purelifi_mac_dev(mac), "init hw failed (%d)\n", r);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	dev_dbg(purelifi_mac_dev(mac), "irq_disabled %d\n", irqs_disabled());
+
+	r = regulatory_hint(hw->wiphy, "CA");
+out:
+	return r;
+}
Simpler without the out: label and a direct return

	if (r) {
		dev_warn(...)
		return r;
	}

	...

	return regulator_hint(hw->wiphy, "CA");
}
+static int download_fpga(struct usb_interface *intf)
+{
[]
+	if ((le16_to_cpu(udev->descriptor.idVendor) ==
+				PURELIFI_X_VENDOR_ID_0) &&
+	    (le16_to_cpu(udev->descriptor.idProduct) ==
+				PURELIFI_X_PRODUCT_ID_0)) {
+		fw_name = "purelifi/li_fi_x/fpga.bit";
+		dev_info(&intf->dev, "bit file for X selected.\n");
+
+	} else if ((le16_to_cpu(udev->descriptor.idVendor)) ==
+					PURELIFI_XC_VENDOR_ID_0 &&
+		   (le16_to_cpu(udev->descriptor.idProduct) ==
+					PURELIFI_XC_PRODUCT_ID_0)) {
+		fw_name = "purelifi/li_fi_x/fpga_xc.bit";
+		dev_info(&intf->dev, "bit filefor XC selected.\n");
Inconsistent dev_info spacing: "file for" vs "filefor"
+	for (fw_data_i = 0; fw_data_i < fw->size;) {
+		int tbuf_idx;
+
+		if ((fw->size - fw_data_i) < blk_tran_len)
+			blk_tran_len = fw->size - fw_data_i;
+
+		fw_data = kmalloc(blk_tran_len, GFP_KERNEL);
+
+		memcpy(fw_data, &fw->data[fw_data_i], blk_tran_len);
+
+		for (tbuf_idx = 0; tbuf_idx < blk_tran_len; tbuf_idx++) {
+			fw_data[tbuf_idx] =
+				((fw_data[tbuf_idx] & 128) >> 7) |
+				((fw_data[tbuf_idx] &  64) >> 5) |
+				((fw_data[tbuf_idx] &  32) >> 3) |
+				((fw_data[tbuf_idx] &  16) >> 1) |
+				((fw_data[tbuf_idx] &   8) << 1) |
+				((fw_data[tbuf_idx] &   4) << 3) |
+				((fw_data[tbuf_idx] &   2) << 5) |
+				((fw_data[tbuf_idx] &   1) << 7);
+		}
pity there isn't an u8_bit_reverse function/mechanism
+static void pretty_print_mac(struct usb_interface *intf, char *serial_number,
+			     unsigned char *hw_address
+			    )
+{
+	unsigned char i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ETH_ALEN; i++)
+		dev_info(&intf->dev, "hw_address[%d]=%x\n", i, hw_address[i]);
I don't think this prettier than %pM
+}
+
+static int upload_mac_and_serial_number(struct usb_interface *intf,
+					unsigned char *hw_address,
+					unsigned char *serial_number)
+{
[]
+	do {
+		unsigned char buf[8];
+
+		msleep(200);
+
+		send_vendor_request(udev, 0x40, buf, sizeof(buf));
+		flash.enabled = buf[0] & 0xFF;
+
+		if (flash.enabled) {
+			flash.sectors = ((buf[6] & 255) << 24) |
buf is unsigned char[], rather pointless using & 255
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/usb.h b/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/usb.h
[]
+struct station_t {
+   //  7...3    |    2     |     1     |     0     |
+   // Reserved  | Hearbeat | FIFO full | Connected |
heartbeat

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help