Thread (31 messages) 31 messages, 6 authors, 2020-10-05

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4] e1000e: Increase polling timeout on MDIC ready bit

From: Kai-Heng Feng <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-05 06:24:06
Also in: intel-wired-lan, lkml

Hi Vitaly,
On Sep 30, 2020, at 14:54, Vitaly Lifshits [off-list ref] wrote:

On 9/29/2020 18:08, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:

Hello Kai-Heng,
quoted
quoted
On Sep 29, 2020, at 21:46, Neftin, Sasha [off-list ref] wrote:

Hello Kai-Heng,
On 9/29/2020 16:31, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
quoted
Hi Sasha,
quoted
On Sep 29, 2020, at 21:08, Neftin, Sasha [off-list ref] wrote:

On 9/28/2020 11:36, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
quoted
We are seeing the following error after S3 resume:
[  704.746874] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: Setting page 0x6020
[  704.844232] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: MDI Write did not complete
[  704.902817] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: Setting page 0x6020
[  704.903075] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: reading PHY page 769 (or 0x6020 shifted) reg 0x17
[  704.903281] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: Setting page 0x6020
[  704.903486] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: writing PHY page 769 (or 0x6020 shifted) reg 0x17
[  704.943155] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: MDI Error
...
[  705.108161] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: Hardware Error
As Andrew Lunn pointed out, MDIO has nothing to do with phy, and indeed
increase polling iteration can resolve the issue.
This patch only papers over the symptom, as we don't really know the
root cause of the issue. The most possible culprit is Intel ME, which
may do its own things that conflict with software.
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <redacted>
---
v4:
 - States that this patch just papers over the symptom.
v3:
 - Moving delay to end of loop doesn't save anytime, move it back.
 - Point out this is quitely likely caused by Intel ME.
v2:
 - Increase polling iteration instead of powering down the phy.
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c
index e11c877595fb..e6d4acd90937 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ s32 e1000e_write_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data)
 	 * Increasing the time out as testing showed failures with
 	 * the lower time out
 	 */
-	for (i = 0; i < (E1000_GEN_POLL_TIMEOUT * 3); i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < (E1000_GEN_POLL_TIMEOUT * 10); i++) {
As we discussed (many threads) - AMT/ME systems not supported on Linux as properly. I do not think increasing polling iteration will solve the problem. Rather mask it.
I am aware of the status quo of no proper support on Intel ME.
quoted
I prefer you check option to disable ME vi BIOS on your system.
We can't ask user to change the BIOS to accommodate Linux. So before a proper solution comes out, masking the problem is good enough for me.
Until then, I'll carry it as a downstream distro patch.
What will you do with system that even after increasing polling time will run into HW error?
Hope we finally have proper ME support under Linux?
Kai-Heng
quoted
quoted
Kai-Heng
quoted
quoted
 		udelay(50);
 		mdic = er32(MDIC);
 		if (mdic & E1000_MDIC_READY)
Thanks,
Sasha
Thanks,
Sasha
On which device ID/platform do you see the issue?
HP Z4 G4 Workstation,
00:1f.6 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation Ethernet Connection (2) I219-LM [8086:15b7]
What is the Firmware version on your platform?
BIOS version: P61 v02.59

What is the ME firmware version that you have?
ME version: 11.11.50.1422
ME mode: AMT disable

Kai-Heng
I am asking these questions, since I know there is supposed to be a fix in the firmware to many issues that are related to ME and device interoperability.

Thanks,

Vitaly
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help