Re: [PATCH RFC PKS/PMEM 48/58] drivers/md: Utilize new kmap_thread()
From: Ira Weiny <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-12 05:28:36
Also in:
amd-gfx, bpf, ceph-devel, dri-devel, intel-gfx, intel-wired-lan, io-uring, kexec, kvm, linux-bcache, linux-block, linux-btrfs, linux-cifs, linux-doc, linux-efi, linux-ext4, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-kselftest, linux-mm, linux-mmc, linux-nfs, linux-rdma, linux-scsi, linux-um, linuxppc-dev, lkml, nvdimm, target-devel, xen-devel
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:20:34AM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
On 2020/10/10 03:50, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
quoted
From: Ira Weiny <redacted>
These kmap() calls are localized to a single thread. To avoid the over
head of global PKRS updates use the new kmap_thread() call.
Hi Ira,
There were a number of options considered.
1) Attempt to change all the thread local kmap() calls to kmap_atomic()
2) Introduce a flags parameter to kmap() to indicate if the mapping
should be global or not
3) Change ~20-30 call sites to 'kmap_global()' to indicate that they
require a global mapping of the pages
4) Change ~209 call sites to 'kmap_thread()' to indicate that the
mapping is to be used within that thread of execution only
I copied the above information from patch 00/58 to this message. The
idea behind kmap_thread() is fine to me, but as you said the new api is
very easy to be missed in new code (even for me). I would like to be
supportive to option 2) introduce a flag to kmap(), then we won't forget
the new thread-localized kmap method, and people won't ask why a
_thread() function is called but no kthread created.
Thanks for the feedback.
I'm going to hold off making any changes until others weigh in. FWIW, I kind
of like option 2 as well. But there is already kmap_atomic() so it seemed like
kmap_XXXX() was more in line with the current API.
Thanks,
Ira
Thanks.
Coly Li