Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: use ethertyped dsa for 6390/6390X | netdev | Ratatoskr

[RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> · 2020-10-27
[RFC PATCH 1/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: use ethertyped dsa for 6390/6390X · Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: use ethertyped dsa for 6390/6390X · Marek Behun <hidden> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: use ethertyped dsa for 6390/6390X · Marek Behun <hidden> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: use ethertyped dsa for 6390/6390X · Marek Behun <hidden> · 2020-10-27
[RFC PATCH 4/4] net: dsa: tag_edsa: support reception of packets from lag devices · Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] net: dsa: tag_edsa: support reception of packets from lag devices · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2020-10-28
Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] net: dsa: tag_edsa: support reception of packets from lag devices · "Tobias Waldekranz" <tobias@waldekranz.com> · 2020-10-28
Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] net: dsa: tag_edsa: support reception of packets from lag devices · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2020-10-28
Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] net: dsa: tag_edsa: support reception of packets from lag devices · "Tobias Waldekranz" <tobias@waldekranz.com> · 2020-10-28
Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] net: dsa: tag_edsa: support reception of packets from lag devices · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2020-10-28
Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] net: dsa: tag_edsa: support reception of packets from lag devices · "Tobias Waldekranz" <tobias@waldekranz.com> · 2020-10-29
Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] net: dsa: tag_edsa: support reception of packets from lag devices · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2020-10-30
Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] net: dsa: tag_edsa: support reception of packets from lag devices · Ido Schimmel <hidden> · 2020-11-01
[RFC PATCH 2/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2020-10-28
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · "Tobias Waldekranz" <tobias@waldekranz.com> · 2020-10-28
[RFC PATCH 3/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: link aggregation support · Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Marek Behun <hidden> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Marek Behun <hidden> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> · 2020-10-28
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Marek Behun <hidden> · 2020-10-28
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2020-10-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> · 2020-10-29
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2020-10-29
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2020-11-11
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2020-11-19
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · "Tobias Waldekranz" <tobias@waldekranz.com> · 2020-11-19
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2020-11-19

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: use ethertyped dsa for 6390/6390X

From: Marek Behun <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-27 17:28:38

On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:51:14 +0100
Tobias Waldekranz [off-list ref] wrote:

The policy is to use ethertyped DSA for all devices that are capable
of doing so, which the Peridot is.

What is the benefit here?