Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 02/17] udp6: move the mss check after udp gso tunnel processing
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-10-09 01:48:59
Also in:
linux-sctp
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 8:45 PM Willem de Bruijn [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:48 AM Xin Long [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
For some protocol's gso, like SCTP, it's using GSO_BY_FRAGS for gso_size. When using UDP to encapsulate its packet, it will return error in udp6_ufo_fragment() as skb->len < gso_size, and it will never go to the gso tunnel processing. So we should move this check after udp gso tunnel processing, the same as udp4_ufo_fragment() does. While at it, also tidy the variables up.Please don't mix a new feature and code cleanup.
Hi, Willem, Tidying up variables are not worth a single patch, that's what I was thinking. I can leave the variables as it is if you wish in this patch.
This patch changes almost every line of the function due to
indentation changes. But the only relevant part is
"
mss = skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size;
if (unlikely(skb->len <= mss))
goto out;
if (skb->encapsulation && skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type &
(SKB_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL|SKB_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL_CSUM))
segs = skb_udp_tunnel_segment(skb, features, true);
else {
/* irrelevant here */
}
out:
return segs;
}
"
Is it a sufficient change to just skip the mss check if mss == GSO_BY_FRAGS?It is sufficient. But I think we'd better keep the code here consistent with ipv4's if there's no other reason to do 'skb->len <= mss' check at the first. We can go with if-else as you showed above now, then do a cleanup in the future. What do you think?