[PATCH bpf-next 1/3] libbpf: fix uninitialized variable in btf_parse_type_sec · Andrii Nakryiko <hidden> · 2020-09-29
[PATCH bpf-next 3/3] libbpf: compile in PIC mode only for shared library case · Andrii Nakryiko <hidden> · 2020-09-29
Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] libbpf: compile in PIC mode only for shared library case · Martin KaFai Lau <hidden> · 2020-09-30
[PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: compile libbpf under -O2 level by default and catch extra warnings · Andrii Nakryiko <hidden> · 2020-09-29
Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: compile libbpf under -O2 level by default and catch extra warnings · Martin KaFai Lau <hidden> · 2020-09-30
Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] libbpf: fix uninitialized variable in btf_parse_type_sec · Martin KaFai Lau <hidden> · 2020-09-30

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: compile libbpf under -O2 level by default and catch extra warnings

From: Martin KaFai Lau <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-30 00:03:51
Also in: bpf

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:06:03PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:

For some reason compiler doesn't complain about uninitialized variable, fixed
in previous patch, if libbpf is compiled without -O2 optimization level. So do
compile it with -O2 and never let similar issue slip by again. -Wall is added
unconditionally, so no need to specify it again.

Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <redacted>

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help